Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: "Greg Maxey" <gmaxey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:25:52 -0500
Jezebel,
I know the first macro I posted had a Bubble Sort routine but then when I
shifted to to the modified Word Frequency macro then on to your class
suggestion I am using a sort process directly in the code. Is the process
I'm using still considered Bubble sort?
I am a little concerned about the size of the list ;-)
--
Greg Maxey/Word MVP
See:
http://gregmaxey.mvps.org/word_tips.htm
For some helpful tips using Word.
Jezebel wrote:
> Don't be too concerned about it, Greg. Bubble sort is the worst of
> methods in that it uses the highest number of processing steps for
> the number of elements to be sorted; on the other hand it is simple
> and doesn't require a lot of code. For relatively small lists (such
> as, one hopes, your list of spelling errors) it is not as
> unreasonable a choice as Howard suggests.
>
> "Greg" <gmaxey@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1112491226.502254.112540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Howard,
>>
>> Is there supposed to be code somewhere on that page for the methode
>> of sorting that you recommend that I used in place of "Bubble" sort?
>> If there is, I didn't see any.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Jezebel
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- References:
- Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Greg Maxey
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Jezebel
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Greg Maxey
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Jezebel
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Howard Kaikow
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Greg
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Jezebel
- Spelling Error Fequency
- Prev by Date: Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- Next by Date: Re: Does Spell/Grammar Check detect run-on sentences, etc?
- Previous by thread: Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- Next by thread: Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|