Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: "Jezebel" <warcrimes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:43:46 +1000
Don't be too concerned about it, Greg. Bubble sort is the worst of methods
in that it uses the highest number of processing steps for the number of
elements to be sorted; on the other hand it is simple and doesn't require a
lot of code. For relatively small lists (such as, one hopes, your list of
spelling errors) it is not as unreasonable a choice as Howard suggests.
"Greg" <gmaxey@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1112491226.502254.112540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Howard,
>
> Is there supposed to be code somewhere on that page for the methode of
> sorting that you recommend that I used in place of "Bubble" sort? If
> there is, I didn't see any.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Greg Maxey
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- References:
- Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Greg Maxey
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Jezebel
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Greg Maxey
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Jezebel
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Howard Kaikow
- Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- From: Greg
- Spelling Error Fequency
- Prev by Date: Re: Macros Disabled in Word 2003
- Next by Date: Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- Previous by thread: Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- Next by thread: Re: Spelling Error Fequency
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|