Re: Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- From: Andreas Prilop <nhtcapri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 15:26:07 +0200
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Tim Murray wrote:
>> I think that this is the source of your confusion. "Most fonts" have,
>> in fact, always included the indicated fractions, ½, ¼, and ¾. Even the
>> one you're using to view this message.
>
> But I'm pretty sure it's not true for fractions for many of the standard Type
> 1s like Times, Helvetica, Courier, and so on.
All TrueType fonts from Apple have included glyphs for *all*
Latin-1 characters from the beginning (~1990).
The _glyphs_ are in the fonts, although the MacRoman character set
does not include such _characters_. It is (or was) the job of the
application to access such glyphs. Most programs can't. Mozilla 1.3
for Mac OS 9 can.
--
Top-posting.
What's the most irritating thing on Usenet?
.
- References:
- Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- From: Tim Murray
- Re: Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- From: Character
- Re: Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- From: Tim Murray
- Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- Next by Date: Re: Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- Previous by thread: Re: Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- Next by thread: Re: Mac shows Windows glyphs okay in old T1 fonts ... but how?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|