Re: Word 2007 Learning Curve

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance



Jim

In a different era, MS provided manuals with the applications. They dropped that idea (probably some tree-hugging evangelist's idea) and replaced them with Help files. However, the help files still have a long way to go to meet most users' requirements. There is far more on line content available through the Help button, but finding it is horrendous.

Terry Farrell

"Jim Vaught" <JimVaught@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:C6EA6560-EC7D-478D-B76D-6E71E198E070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's something I don't understand then, because you would think they would
want "how to guides" out on the market ASAP to increase sales of the
software. I assumed they at least provided documentation to authors in order
to facilitate that process.

"Suzanne S. Barnhill" wrote:

I'll be interested in Herb's answer, but my impression is that authors have
to figure it out mostly for themselves, working with a beta version and just
trying out all the program features. To be sure, they build on their
knowledge of previous versions, but discovery of new features, I think, is
left up to the author. If MS provides any guidance, I'd be interested to
hear about it.

--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
http://word.mvps.org

"Jim Vaught" <JimVaught@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2A194EFB-CDE9-44E6-9F20-23745062D6FA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Herb: I bought your book yesterday and am finding it useful so far, but
> I've
> still got a LOT to learn
> about Word 2007. Something I've been curious about: How do people such > as
> yourself write a book
> on new software programs or editions of those programs? Do the > software
> companies provide you and other software guide manuals' authors with > their
> documentation generated when they were developing the program, or what?
>
> "Herb Tyson [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> When I agreed to write a book about Word 2007, I faced exactly the >> same
>> problem you're facing. But, because Word 2007 was the object rather >> than
>> the
>> means, I had no choice in the matter. At the outset, I was using Word
>> 2003
>> to write the book, but at some point, critical productivity mass was
>> achieved, and I found that new Word 2007 features made me more
>> productive,
>> and so I wrote the last half of the book using Word 2007.
>>
>> I don't know if there are "classic" interface tools for Excel, but >> there
>> are
>> several for Word 2007:
>>
>> http://www.addintools.com/english/menuword/
>>
>> http://pschmid.net/blog/2007/04/20/111
>>
>> I believe that the second option is free. So, for Word, at least, you
>> have
>> at least three choices:
>>
>> 1. Bite the bullet and learn Word 2007, knowing that Word 14 will >> surely
>> build on Word 2007/12 rather than on Word 2003/11; this is the best
>> option
>> if you need to keep up with future versions of Word. If it's hard to >> get
>> used to the new interface now in Word 12, it will only be more >> difficult
>> several years from now with Word 14.
>>
>> 2. Use a classic interface tool, relying on it when you're in a hurry,
>> but
>> otherwise dabbling and gradually learning the ribbon approach. This is >> a
>> good option if Word 2007 has features that you need, but you don't >> need
>> to
>> learn Word 2007 in a hurry. There are other learning aids you can use, >> as
>> well, such as the interactive guide that shows you where to find Word
>> 2007
>> commands and features:
>> http://office.microsoft.com/assistance/asstvid.aspx?assetid=XT100766331033&vwidth=1044&vheight=788&type=flash&CTT=11&Origin=HA100744321033.
>>
>> 3. Revert to Word 2003. This is a good option if Word 2003 provides
>> everything you need and if you won't need to work with documents that
>> rely
>> upon Word 2007-specific features that aren't preserved when using the
>> Office
>> 2007 Compatibility Pack.
>>
>> A 4th option--not incompatible with #1 and #2--is to set up Word >> 2007's
>> Quick Access Toolbar so that it contains your most-used tools from >> Word
>> 2003
>> (do the same for Excel 2007). This is the approach I use for my >> everyday
>> work, and it has alleviated a lot of Word 2007's ergonomic
>> inefficiencies.
>> One approach to this is shown here:
>>
>> http://word2007bible.herbtyson.com/2007/05/02/making-word-2007-a-little-more-familiar/
>>
>>
>> -- >> Herb Tyson MS MVP
>> Author of the Word 2007 Bible
>> Blog: http://word2007bible.herbtyson.com
>> Web: http://www.herbtyson.com
>> "JMB" <jmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:0AB12808-0879-4AD7-B3EE-57299613C21A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > I'll make an honest attempt to give this question/feedback a >> > positive
>> > twist.
>> > I have been using Word/Excel etc. for years now and consider myself
>> > somewhat
>> > of an expert user. Now I have a new computer with Vista and Office
>> > 2007.
>> > And
>> > I essentially find myself facing this predicament of going up an
>> > enormously
>> > steep learning curve, i.e. relearning how to wordprocess and
>> > spreadsheet
>> > almost from scratch all over again. The new and improved of Office >> > 2007
>> > apps
>> > may look much more "politically correct" than in previous versions, >> > but
>> > so
>> > far my experience has been that it can hardly get any less user
>> > friendly
>> > and
>> > more convoluted than this. I'm giving it a very serious try here, >> > but
>> > I'm
>> > also beginning to think about throwing in the towel. Anybody out >> > there
>> > that
>> > can offer any useful advice as to how I can actually start using the
>> > Office
>> > 2007 applications without letting all my previous experience and
>> > know-how
>> > completely go to waste?
>> > -- >> > JMB
>>
>>
>




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Windows XP running very slow
    ... applications like AntiVirus, etc) that load up at startup. ... I'll mainly work around Windows XP, as that is what the bulk of this ... look into the features of the one you choose. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
    ... >> normal Linux sysadmin. ... I am not saying it couldn't be done in userland. ... across most applications. ... >> changes or bring new features because old applications will break. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
    ... >> normal Linux sysadmin. ... I am not saying it couldn't be done in userland. ... across most applications. ... >> changes or bring new features because old applications will break. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4
    ... >> normal Linux sysadmin. ... I am not saying it couldn't be done in userland. ... across most applications. ... >> changes or bring new features because old applications will break. ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: The software development process.
    ... Could you please advice how you provide the software development ... Listing the features sales promiced the customer ... Print manuals ... Promice upgrades that can't be done ...
    (comp.arch.embedded)