Re: Master doc or volumes??
- From: "yepp" <yepphers@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Dec 2005 10:23:25 -0800
Charles Kenyon wrote:
> Do not use the Master Document feature. It is still not recommended in Word
> 2003.
> --
> Charles Kenyon
>
> Word New User FAQ & Web Directory: http://addbalance.com/word
>
> Intermediate User's Guide to Microsoft Word (supplemented version of
> Microsoft's Legal Users' Guide) http://addbalance.com/usersguide
>
> See also the MVP FAQ: http://word.mvps.org/FAQs/ which is awesome!
> --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
> This message is posted to a newsgroup. Please post replies
> and questions to the newsgroup so that others can learn
> from my ignorance and your wisdom.
>
> "yepp" <yepphers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1135010898.434189.197120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I have a huge document to compile.... it will have over 200 individual
> > documents altogether plus all the front matter, TOC, etc.
> >
> > I have read that Master docs are not recommended. Is this still the
> > case with MSWord 2002 version?
> >
> > Also, these documents have many graphics, embedded math font (universal
> > math) for equations.
> >
> > What would be the best way to put this together? Do you recommend the
> > Master doc method or just put into 4 or 6 volumes and make a separate
> > TOC?
Thanks Charles. Is that the recommendation of users, or does MS say it
is unstable? I would like something to take to my supervisor to let
him know Master Doc is NOT the way to go.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Master doc or volumes??
- From: Charles Kenyon
- Re: Master doc or volumes??
- References:
- Master doc or volumes??
- From: yepp
- Re: Master doc or volumes??
- From: Charles Kenyon
- Master doc or volumes??
- Prev by Date: Re: Master doc or volumes??
- Next by Date: Re: Master doc or volumes??
- Previous by thread: Re: Master doc or volumes??
- Next by thread: Re: Master doc or volumes??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|