Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: "Suzanne S. Barnhill" <sbarnhill@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:49:29 -0500
Sounds like a pretty long list of cons. But more incentive for me to just
upgrade this machine to XP rather than get a new one with Vista installed
(though I'll still do that down the road a piece).
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so
all may benefit.
"Herb Tyson [MVP]" <herb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23F8TVa%23pHHA.4132@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In some ways, yes. In others, no. I really like the ease of working withfolders --
Windows Explorer in Vista, and its integration into the Office 2007 file
dialogs. I've also grown to like the look of the Aero Glass display.
Networking is also much less hassle than I've had in any other version of
Windows. In fact, it was no hassle at all. It simply worked without my
having to jump through hoops. I like the way Windows Update works in
Vista--fewer problems than in XP (for me, anyway).
On the other hand, the IntelliPoint and IntelliType drivers for mouse &
keyboard are AWFUL, particularly the mouse driver. Zooming does not work
correctly, and I basically scrapped my Laser Mouse 6000 because so much
about it didn't work. I've replaced the IntelliPoint driver with something
called X-Mouse. It's not great, but at least it works.
MSFeedsSync.exe crashes 5 to 10 times a day. No clue why. I keep googling
for a solution but nothing I've seen/tried has fixed it yet.
I've tried several times to upgrade my C: partition from Premium to
Ultimate. But, it fails without saying why.
Other hardware, such as my DVico HDTV device is only partially supported,
and freezes/crashes at odd times.
And UAC is a real pain in the posterior. It constantly asks permission for
this and that. I don't feel more secure, just more annoyed.
Also, frequently, Vista sits here and denies me access to various
for no good reason I can fathom. Some, I can whittle away at andeventually
gain access. Others, however, steadfastly remain beyond reach (even when Inewsgroup
gave up and turned UAC off).
So... yes and no. :-)
--
Herb Tyson MS MVP
Author of the Word 2007 Bible
Blog: http://word2007bible.herbtyson.com
Web: http://www.herbtyson.com
"Suzanne S. Barnhill" <sbarnhill@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%238Scth9pHHA.588@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do you now consider it an "upgrade"?
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
wordso
all may benefit.
"Herb Tyson [MVP]" <herb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:06A410AE-3E0E-478B-9F14-7322BA4F36F2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's correct. And, at the time, I'm not sure I would have used the
2007"upgrade"... more like "install and use" ;-)
--
Herb Tyson MS MVP
Author of the Word 2007 Bible
Blog: http://word2007bible.herbtyson.com
Web: http://www.herbtyson.com
"Suzanne S. Barnhill" <sbarnhill@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ubf8AZ3pHHA.3368@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
IIRC, Herb said that when he was taking screen shots for his Word
things.newsgroupBible, MS Press insisted that they be made in Vista, so he had little
choice
but to upgrade.
--
Suzanne S. Barnhill
Microsoft MVP (Word)
Words into Type
Fairhope, Alabama USA
Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org
Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the
deployedso
all may benefit.
"Lee" <bunwillis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A14C5870-6431-4732-8828-2FA863D594CD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for your very polite and helpful input, Herb. I have not
Vista yet because of the unavailability of drivers for so many
orThe
Upgrade Analyser is another joke. It leads one to believe that his
thehercompatibility
system is all ready for Vista, then in the area of drivers and
of other software, it makes some vague references to checking with
understandvendors. I find that very misleading, to say the least. I
havethat
Bill Gates has been pleading with the third party vendors to upgrade
their
drivers and non-compatible programs. That is a good start but I
herebeen
waiting until the Vista OS is really supported by most third party
vendors
before putting my systems into a tizzy. I also run three systems
newat
home and I build new systems for clients. My experiences with XP,the
when
it
was brand new, have made me more than a little reluctant to step out
of
pot into the kettle with Vista, although I would enjoy some of the
I'veusesfeatures.. LOL Have a nice day.
--
Lee0078
"Herb Tyson [MVP]" wrote:
Hi, Lee,
I'm mostly using Vista, so I've no clue about OE's spelling. Vista
Windows Mail instead of OE, and handles spelling just fine (and
you'rekept
Word 2003 and its proofing tools on my Windows XP machines, so I
haven't
noticed anything missing).
But, using Word 2007's spelling checker, I'm not seeing what
here --seeing.
It's not tagging correctly spelled words incorrectly and ignoring
misspellings. Spelling, for what it's worth, is working fine
flagSpanish,weand
Vista,have Office 2007 installed on four different computers -- two
running
and two running Windows XP. On three of these, I use English,
it'sand
French proofing tools, and all are working correctly.
As for the grammar checker being a joke... I agree completely, but
artificialprogram's)nothing new. I've never seen any version of Word's (or any other
grammar checker that's even worth turning on. I suspect that
abouthelpful inintelligence is still a decade or more away from being able to be
the grammar department. The new "contextual spelling" checker is
the
only useful new spelling/grammar feature, since it does seem to
anyonehowever,*some*
words that are used incorrectly. Even the contextual checker,
I'mmisses a lot more than it catches.
I've never been what could be described as a "loyal Microsoft
customer."
a critical consumer. I get annoyed and frustrated, just like
locationspointelse,
Ibut I like to dig until I find a solution to any given problem, or
until
hit a brick wall. I suspect that most other MVPs are very much the
same.
Office 2007 has its good points, and its bad points. But, at this
filefor
me, it has enough good points that I've chosen to stick with it.
Good points for me include: instant search in Outlook, more robust
formatting,formats (harder to break and accidentally corrupt), live preview
automaticbetter chart/graphics creation tools, the ability to blog (with
betterpicture handling) directly from Word, much better equation editor,
Word,ability to set Word-wide formatting defaults, bibliography feature
in
use of themes and style sets, and the addition of trusted
features,accessible(which
makes working with macros a LOT less frustrating).
Bad points include: lack of customizability in the UI, less
style
tools in Word, still-broken numbering and master document
featureshorribly
confusing handling/finding/setting of options, and too many
Favoriteaccessthat
are buried too far down in the UI, requiring many more steps to
than
keyboardin Office 2003. Much of this I can solve with the QAT and custom
itassignments, easing the frustration a bit for me personally.
Under Vista, the file dialogs are now all integrated into the OS,
making
ridiculously easy to add frequently-accessed folders to the
withLinks
area (Vista's replacement for the Places feature). This, along
andother
new features in Vista, adds immeasurably to my own productivity
wouldn'tboosterIhow
work, making a Vista/Office 2007 combination a net productivity
for
Windows XPme.
But, as in all things computing-wise, YMMV. If I were still using
(it's what I use on my laptop when traveling), I suspect I
isbe
quite
so sanguine about Office 2007 (except for Outlook 2007, which IMO
2007,Firstvastly
improved over 2003).
--
Herb Tyson MS MVP
Author of the Word 2007 Bible
Blog: http://word2007bible.herbtyson.com
Web: http://www.herbtyson.com
"Lee" <bunwillis@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:50FFA4D8-20FE-4F06-A61C-BC5C3BF4C37B@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The Office 2007 software suite is a productivity stopper.
it
only
provides a French dictionary for OE7. Then while in Word
ansimpleboth
the
English grammar and spell checkers are very poor. It tags
englishcorrect.
words as incorrect and misspellings of simple three letter
words
as
The grammar checker is simply a joke. The spell checker is
bundlesigned-off oneven
worse
joke on Microsoft's loyal customers. Fire the fools that
commandthis
conglomeration of bad programs.
Speaking from 30 plus years experience developing government
and
control software, I would have been fired for fielding this
of
sinceuseless
zeros and ones. Although I have been a loyal Microsoft
customer
its
beginning, I am very angry about this.
--
Lee0078
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Herb Tyson [MVP]
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- References:
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Microsoft
- From: Suzanne S. Barnhill
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Lee
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Herb Tyson [MVP]
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Lee
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Suzanne S. Barnhill
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Herb Tyson [MVP]
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Suzanne S. Barnhill
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- From: Herb Tyson [MVP]
- Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Microsoft
- Prev by Date: Re: Word 2007 Document Preview Pane
- Next by Date: Re: linking references
- Previous by thread: Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- Next by thread: Re: Is anybody else disgusted about the piece of junk called Micro
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|