Re: Office/Word not a good tool for read-only emailed docs?
From: Suzanne S. Barnhill (sbarnhill_at_mvps.org)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: Suzanne S. Barnhill: "Re: User Name Incorrect"
- Previous message: Suzanne S. Barnhill: "Re: Heading styles applied to words (size, weight etc), but style remains 'Normal'"
- In reply to: tony: "Re: Office/Word not a good tool for read-only emailed docs?"
- Next in thread: tony: "Re: Office/Word not a good tool for read-only emailed docs?"
- Reply: tony: "Re: Office/Word not a good tool for read-only emailed docs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 21:25:42 -0500
Well, you choose Word because you can't (practically) *create* documents in
Acrobat.
-- Suzanne S. Barnhill Microsoft MVP (Word) Words into Type Fairhope, Alabama USA Word MVP FAQ site: http://word.mvps.org Email cannot be acknowledged; please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup so all may benefit. "tony" <tonySPAMGUARDnews@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:#k8x56oTEHA.3872@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... > > "Jay Freedman" <jay.freedman@verizon.net> wrote in message > news:drdfc0tiipdjf6hr4mlbr9tijeikriruj7@4ax.com... > > Hi Tony > > > > This topic is often discussed in the newsgroups. > > > > You're correct... sort of. Word was always designed to be an *editor* > > -- a program for creating and modifying documents. Any efforts to make > > Word documents uneditable are really fighting the nature if the thing. > > > > PDF was designed as a display/print format. Unless you have the full > > Acrobat authoring program, it is (or was, until recently) fairly hard > > to modify an existing PDF file. There are now a number of programs, > > mostly optical character recognition (OCR), that can easily turn a PDF > > file into a Word file, making PDF considerably less secure than you > > think. And it was always possibly to print the PDF and then scan/OCR > > the paper copy. > > > > The rule to remember is "if I can read your document, I can alter it." > > The only electronic document that's really safe from tampering is the > > one you never send to anyone. If it's a matter of legal proof, use > > paper or escrow the documents with a third party. > > So you're saying that the following scenario cannot be had: > > I create a contract of some sort, protect it, email it to a client, have them > print it out, sign it and send it back to me via snail mail. I have no way of > knowing if an "or" was changed to "and" somewhere in the document by > any means available. OK, understood. > > But what if I just wanted it to be NOT SO EASY to exploit? Couldn't it > be made much more simpler than IRM? What does IRM get me that > some kind of password read-only protection couldn't get me? The problem > with "read-only" in Word is that it's still copyable and saveable, especially > form fields are hard to protect. Why can't MS implement real read-only > where no caret would even show up in the doc and no cut-n-paste or save > as another file would be allowed without the password? Isn't this very > fundamental (sending a contract or other document to someone outside > of the company!)? I just don't understand why it has to be so difficult and > so imposing on authors and recipients (I need a service to send a read-only > doc or receive one? Ouch!). > > I'm trying to give a client of mine this functionality and am now looking at > conversion to PDF via a print driver as a simpler solution than IRM to > get read-only functionality. If I would have known this would become an > issue, I may have chosen Acrobat to begin with rather than Word. > Certainly I'm going to be asked by the client why I selected Word in the > first place if we end up converting to PDF in then end. > > Tony > > > > > "tony" <tonySPAMGUARDnews@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > > >I'm wondering if .pdf would be better. That's what the government > > >uses mostly it seems. Word docs are too difficult to protect (make > > >read-only): requires IRM which requires Server 2003 or passport > > >accounts for recipients and browser client and doubles file size. > > >Does it really take that much technology to make a doc readonly??!! > > > > > >Is PDF the simpler solution to sending protected documents > > >outside of a company (to clients, for example: contracts)? > > > > > >Tony > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Jay Freedman > > Microsoft Word MVP FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/word > >
- Next message: Suzanne S. Barnhill: "Re: User Name Incorrect"
- Previous message: Suzanne S. Barnhill: "Re: Heading styles applied to words (size, weight etc), but style remains 'Normal'"
- In reply to: tony: "Re: Office/Word not a good tool for read-only emailed docs?"
- Next in thread: tony: "Re: Office/Word not a good tool for read-only emailed docs?"
- Reply: tony: "Re: Office/Word not a good tool for read-only emailed docs?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|