Re: Word 97 Windows 98 macro error

Tech-Archive recommends: Speed Up your PC by fixing your registry

From: Charles Kenyon (msnewsgroup_at_remove.no.spam.addbalance.com)
Date: 04/30/04 

Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 15:46:21 -0500

Your code has one or more commands that won't compile with the Word 97 vba.
Since it is digitally signed, you won't be able to view the code in Word 97. 

-- 
Charles Kenyon
Word New User FAQ & Web Directory: http://addbalance.com/word
Intermediate User's Guide to Microsoft Word (supplemented version of
Microsoft's Legal Users' Guide) http://addbalance.com/usersguide
See also the MVP FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/word which is awesome!
 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
This message is posted to a newsgroup. Please post replies
and questions to the newsgroup so that others can learn
from my ignorance and your wisdom.
"Roy" <rgracious@lycos.com> wrote in message
news:37910ef0.0404301159.1ac7459d@posting.google.com...
> Hi All,
>          I am having problems with a macro. This is the lowdown.
>
> I have a custom template with some macros in it. The template is
> signed digitally (in word 2000). I run the macro in this template in a
> windows 2000, word 97, IE 5.5 environment and I have no problems.
>
> I get a "Compile error in hidden module: ThisDocument" when I try to
> run the macro in a windows 98, word 97 and IE 6 environment.
>
> Anyone have any ideas?
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Roy.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: importing macros from Word 2003 for windows to Word 2004 for mac
    ... Yes, the macros will work. ... Word 2004 will not recognise a Normal template that has the extension ".dot" ... That writes the Mac file type and creator code into the template, ... that will not compile on one platform or the other. ...
    (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
  • Template Size
    ... I have a template with macros and the size of ... the template is getter bigger and bigger. ... A part from Compile, what can I do to reduce its size? ...
    (microsoft.public.word.vba.general)
  • Re: Yet another when to use macros question....
    ... Lisp data to go in, and quality machine code to pop out! ... You keep saying that code with functions only is better than macros. ... compile all the way to native code). ... SETQ is a general-purpose assignment operator that ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Y2038 and time_t
    ... is the smallest and largest I can get in there so I know whether conversion ... |> Later I generalized the problem with the macros shown in the code below. ... |> to a final value at compile time. ... I don't know how far back in gcc versions ...
    (comp.unix.programmer)
  • Re: Lisp2Perl - Lisp to perl compiler
    ... >>it the function must be evaluated at compile time as well as runtime. ... >>the lisp code into a perl script which can be executed in the normal ... > in the Perl interpreter, then get back to the job at hand. ... >>problem if all it does is define things (functions and macros). ...
    (comp.lang.perl.misc)