Re: Underlining feature in AutoFormat does Ital instead

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: Stefan Blom (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 04/08/04 

Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:14:29 +0200

Isn't the latter occurrence of "Emphasis" in the sentence you're
quoting displayed in italics in Help?

I currently don't have access to Word 97, but in Word 2000 the
complete context help text for "Replace *bold* and _italic_ with
real formatting" (on the AutoFormat As You Type tab of the
Tools>AutoCorrect dialog box) is the following:

"Applies bold character formatting to words enclosed in asterisks
(*), and applies italic character formatting to words enclosed in
underscore characters (_). For example, Word changes *Strong* to
Strong and _Emphasis_ to Emphasis." 

-- 
Stefan Blom
"Larry" <larry328@att.net> wrote in message
news:epWCdW%23GEHA.2160@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
Stefan,
What you say is not correct.  The contextualized help item for
that AutoFormat feature says:
"Word changes _Emphasis_ to Emphasis."
Larry
Stefan Blom wrote:
> Word is behaving as expected. The entry on the AutoFormat As
You
> Type tab of the Tools > AutoCorrect dialog box reads: "Replace
> *bold* and _italic_ with real formatting." In other words: a
word
> or phrase surrounded by asterisks assume the bold attribute,
and
> similarly, underline characters apply the italic attribute.
>
>
> "Larry" <larry328@att.net> wrote in message
> news:evfPKYmGEHA.1368@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > One of the AutoFormat features in Word 97 is supposed to
change
> > underlining
> > symbols (like _this_) to underlining.  Instead, it changes it
> to
> > italics.  Is there any way to correct this?
> >
> > Larry

Relevant Pages

  • Re: CSS type selector problem
    ... this planet have no italics. ... I limited the scope to the Latin script, since _even there_ the idea of using italics and bolding as "emphasis" and "strong emphasis" is questionable and surely not universally applicable. ... It's normally expressed indirectly in typography books by explaining how italics was designed for serif fonts, how italics is the main method for emphasis in copy text, how italics can be rather unnoticeable for sans-serif fonts and how bolding is a way to make sans-serif more prominent, and sans-serif fonts often have several different-weight versions to compensate for the problems of using italics. ...
    (comp.infosystems.www.authoring.stylesheets)
  • Re: Underlining feature in AutoFormat does Ital instead
    ... "Emphasis" for italics. ... "Stefan Blom" wrote in message ... > "Applies bold character formatting to words enclosed in asterisks ...
    (microsoft.public.word.application.errors)
  • Re: SCALES??? I dont get it!!!
    ... Roger E. Blumberg wrote: ... Italics are used to indicate _emphasis_ in written language. ... The best way to indicate emphasis in written language is to couch your statements so clearly and unambiguously that everyone who can read will get the most important bits without you having to shout at them. ...
    (alt.guitar.beginner)
  • Re: Wollman used *bold*!
    ... first time I see the explanation with "emphasize". ... used for emphasis in typewriter text, italics are used for emphasis ... The asterisk is most common, ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Underlining feature in AutoFormat does Ital instead
    ... The contextualized help item for that AutoFormat feature says: ... Larry ... underline characters apply the italic attribute. ... >> italics. ...
    (microsoft.public.word.application.errors)