Re: LocalAlloc is it cached?



Alright thanks a lot I changed the allocation method and it worked

"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" wrote:

Well, I'm sure that it's cacheable. Think about it: this is the standard
use-it-everywhere memory allocation function for the entire operating
system. There's no way that it would be uncached; performance would suck.
I have, however, no idea if the fact that it's cacheable has anything to do
with the actual problem...

Paul T.

"kibkid" <kibkid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:63CBA98B-76B6-48A6-9231-A56B3F545375@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Anybody??



.