Re: LocalAlloc is it cached?
- From: kibkid <kibkid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:11:03 -0700
Alright thanks a lot I changed the allocation method and it worked
"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" wrote:
Well, I'm sure that it's cacheable. Think about it: this is the standard.
use-it-everywhere memory allocation function for the entire operating
system. There's no way that it would be uncached; performance would suck.
I have, however, no idea if the fact that it's cacheable has anything to do
with the actual problem...
"kibkid" <kibkid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message