Re: MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- From: "Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" <p space tobey no spam AT no instrument no spam DOT com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:37:21 -0700
Well, you can be sure that the driver will be in RAM while it's executing,
so it might run a little faster, depending on what the options you put in
the BIB file when it was in the MODULES section were. Load time during
startup might be slightly affected while the file is actually loaded into
RAM, again, depending on the old settings. Unless you have some observed
problem, I don't see any reason to worry about it before you even try it.
Paul T.
<tpandey02@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0cfdd9ec-c5e4-49d3-af57-c4a5b529abf8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi All,
Can anybody tell me that if I move my driver dll from MODULES section
to FILES section is there going to be any effect as far as my driver
working is concern ?
I mean is what is the difference If I move my driver from MODULES to
FILES ?I wanted to read a file from release directory and after moving
that to FILES section I can read that now but don't know if the
performance of the driver will have any impact.
Tpandey
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- From: tpandey02
- Re: MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- References:
- MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- From: tpandey02
- MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- Prev by Date: MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- Next by Date: Re: MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- Previous by thread: MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- Next by thread: Re: MODULES vs FILES in bib file
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
