Re: FAL performance with hive-base registry in NAND flash
- From: "K. S. Huang" <k_Underln_s_Underln_huang_AT_yahoo_DOT_com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:04:09 -0700
Have you ever tried to enable the disk cache with a large writeback cache
size that might help a bit on your Flash performance when mounted as root.
"Brain" <Brain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uscHar5FIHA.936@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear Michel,
Wow...this is the problem I met.
I really appreciate your guidance.
Thank you,
Brain
"Michel Verhagen [eMVP]" <support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
???????:%23uOBDy4FIHA.700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If you use hive-based registry, do you also set your NAND flash as "Mount
as root"?
If that's what you do, then that's the reason for the long boot times.
See
http://groups.google.co.nz/group/microsoft.public.windowsce.embedded/browse_thread/thread/c7f335e6eb8b9185/d01aafa4e1136463?hl=en&lnk=st&q=#d01aafa4e1136463
for more info.
Good luck,
Michel Verhagen, eMVP
GuruCE
http://GuruCE.com
Brain wrote:
Hi experts,
I have one perfomance problem of NAND flash.
If I use ram-based registry, system will take 15 secs to boot up
If I use hive-based registry, system will take 31 secs to boot up
(registry is stored in NAND flash)
Is this speed normal?
What can I do to make the boot up faster?
any comment would be appreciated.
OS: WinCE 5.0
Platform: freescale iMX31
Thank you,
Brain
.
- References:
- FAL performance with hive-base registry in NAND flash
- From: Brain
- Re: FAL performance with hive-base registry in NAND flash
- From: Michel Verhagen [eMVP]
- Re: FAL performance with hive-base registry in NAND flash
- From: Brain
- FAL performance with hive-base registry in NAND flash
- Prev by Date: Re: CE 6.0 Display Driver Rotation
- Next by Date: Re: Regarding WC5.0 Kernel Code
- Previous by thread: Re: FAL performance with hive-base registry in NAND flash
- Next by thread: The ATA hard disk read/write speed in wince600 is worse than wince500 especially via file system
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|