Re: question about thread scheduling
- From: "Zhiqiang Li" <zhiqiang.li@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:38:11 +0200
Is there any way to write debug messages into a file on CEPC instead of
write them over KITL, since heavy transitions from KITL to application make
it difficult to see real time performance.
thanks
Zhiqiang
"Zhiqiang Li" <zhiqiang.li@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:Ob5K9jHcHHA.4808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Chris,
thanks for your help!
Zhiqiang
"<ctacke/>" <ctacke[@]opennetcf[dot]com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:%23DKFEqGcHHA.4888@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CeSetThreadPriority(GetCurrentThread(), priority);
--
Chris Tacke - Embedded MVP
OpenNETCF Consulting
Managed Code in the Embedded World
www.opennetcf.com
--
"Zhiqiang Li" <zhiqiang.li@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23fkcpiGcHHA.3408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dear All,
there is any way to change the default priority of the main thread of
an application process?
thanks in advance
Zhiqiang
"Zhiqiang Li" <zhiqiang.li@xxxxxxxxxx> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:OBk93KvaHHA.4552@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Remi,
I realize that I have misunderstood what you have told me. Actually,
what you provided is the template for my implementation.
thanks a lot for your help!
Zhiqiang
"Remi de Gravelaine" <gravelaine at aton dash sys dot fr> schrieb im
Newsbeitrag news:OHk45G9ZHHA.4520@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Zhiqiang,
You should try to tell us *exactly* what you want to do.
You should also avoid multiplying the discussion threads if you want
people to take care of you from the beginning.
If I understood what you want to do, you have implemented a polling
loop to do some job (what kind of job?) every 4ms.
You have put this loop in a high-priority thread started by the
XXX_Init function of a stream driver.
You are using CE 6.0 on a CEPC.
The loop should thus look like:
while (!g_bSuicide)
{
Sleep(3);
<do some job>
}
There is no reason that such a loop exits except when g_bSuicide is
set to TRUE (something that can be done in XXX_Deinit) or the <do some
job> code executes a break of goto intruction.
Now, why Sleep(3) instead of Sleep(4)? Because Sleep(3) will sleep for
*at least* 3 ms and because Sleep is synchonized on timer ticks, that
fire every ms (producing the SYSINTR_RESCHED you are focusing on.) So,
Sleep(3) returns from sleeping right after the third tick and a new
1ms slice begins. You <do some job> during a portion of this slice and
reenter Sleep(3). Sleep(3) puts your thread to sleep for 3 timer ticks
and that means the time remaining in the current tick + 3 ms.
HTH
Remi
.
- References:
- question about thread scheduling
- From: Zhiqiang Li
- Re: question about thread scheduling
- From: Remi de Gravelaine
- Re: question about thread scheduling
- From: Zhiqiang Li
- Re: question about thread scheduling
- From: Zhiqiang Li
- Re: question about thread scheduling
- From: <ctacke/>
- Re: question about thread scheduling
- From: Zhiqiang Li
- question about thread scheduling
- Prev by Date: Re: question about thread scheduling
- Next by Date: Re: Putting wince in sleep mode
- Previous by thread: Re: question about thread scheduling
- Next by thread: Is CE6 really Real-Time???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|