Re: driver loading sequence
- From: "Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)" <nospam1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 16:42:30 -0500
But I found that waiting an event calling WaitforSingleOject isn't aDon't do it with an event like that. use the Order value in the registery to
good idea in the init function. this will slow down the whole system's
booting up.
any good approach to this issue?
have drivers loaded based on an increasing value in the order value. So that
the order for B is C+1 and A is B+1 that way the device manager will load
them and call the init functions in the correct sequence and you can know
the driver has returned from Init correctly.
Although I would seriously challenge you to re-think your design as a 3
layered driver model like that would be an exceptionally rare thing. There
is probably a better way of doing things.
--
Steve Maillet
EmbeddedFusion
www.EmbeddedFusion.com
smaillet at EmbeddedFusion dot com
.
- References:
- driver loading sequence
- From: suqian99
- Re: driver loading sequence
- From: Bruce Eitman [eMVP]
- driver loading sequence
- Prev by Date: Re: Lost cemgrc.exe during make kernel
- Next by Date: Re: Conversion of YCbCr (4:2:2) to jpeg
- Previous by thread: Re: driver loading sequence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|