Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: "Dean Ramsier" <ramsiernospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:56:12 -0500
IPSM has a different model than the MSFlash drivers. It is not a filesystem
that runs on top of a block driver. IPSM is a complete solution and manages
the flash directly. It only works with Intel flash (and possibly some
clones).
The advantage with IPSM is that you can XIP from the same flash device that
you are using for storage. The MSFlash driver does not support that model.
--
Dean Ramsier - eMVP
BSQUARE Corporation
"Steve Maillet (eMVP)" <nospam1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Oaj3VuwQGHA.1688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Talk to Intel about IPSM. TFAT REQUIRES the underlying block driver
support atomic sector operations. IPSM may or may not support that.
--
Steve Maillet
EmbeddedFusion
www.EmbeddedFusion.com
smaillet at EmbeddedFusion dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Anton Jarl
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- References:
- Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Anton Jarl
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Anton Jarl
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Anthony Pellerin
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Anton Jarl
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Anthony Pellerin
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Anton Jarl
- Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- From: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)
- Alternatives to TFAT?
- Prev by Date: problem with source filter registration
- Next by Date: Re: Makeimg not copying project files to FLATRELEASEDIR
- Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to TFAT?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|