Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- From: "Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)" <nospam1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:26:16 -0500
>>I don't have any experience with your particular board, but to point
>>you in the right direction I'd suggest you check out the "BOOTJUMP"
>>setting under the CONFIG section of the bib-file -especially
>>"BOOTJUMP=NONE".
>>You also might want to look at the ROMOFFSET setting to fixup the
>>addresses of your bootloaderbootloader(!).
Don't bother with either of those, they do not work. (The only CPU that ever
worked on was PowerPC) This subject has been covered in great detail many
times in the newsgroups and I've personally gone through every possible
gyration to remove that 4k block successfully without resorting to hand
coding location independent assembly code. None of them work. The MS tools
just don't support that at this time. There is also a problem with BIN files
being located at address 0 since a BIN record with address 0 is also used to
indicate the end of the bin file.
--
Steve Maillet
EmbeddedFusion
www.EmbeddedFusion.com
smaillet at EmbeddedFusion dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- From: Henrik Viklund
- Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- References:
- Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- From: Sergeant
- Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- From: Anthony Pellerin
- Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- From: Sergeant
- Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- From: Henrik Viklund
- Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- Prev by Date: Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- Next by Date: Re: Run .NET application
- Previous by thread: Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- Next by thread: Re: Steppingstone and bootloader - part II
- Index(es):