Re: ramdisk and build time bottle neck
- From: "Chris Tacke, eMVP" <ctacke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 18:29:24 -0500
How fast of a build are you shooting for? More RAM and especially faster
hard drives make a difference. A full-up build should take less than 15
minutes (on my machine the average is about 12) and I don't do that very
often, usually it's a process of rebuilding a driver or a piece of the
system and running makeimg.
--
Chris Tacke
Co-founder
OpenNETCF.org
Are you using the SDF? Let's do a case study.
Email us at d c s @ o p e n n e t c f . c o m
http://www.opennetcf.org/donate
"Thomas Spellman" <no@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ezBQSnQ$FHA.504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I've been asked to do a test of putting some parts of the build tree on
> a ramdisk to see if it reduces the build time. My impression thus far
> is that the primary bottle neck is CPU time, and that it would be better
> to do targeted builds of only changed sections of code rather than
> trying to use ramdisks to make complete rebuilds faster. What do you
> guys think? Is there a role for a ramdisk to decrease build times?
>
> Also, how does one seperate the platform tree out to a ramdisk?
>
> T
.
- References:
- ramdisk and build time bottle neck
- From: Thomas Spellman
- ramdisk and build time bottle neck
- Prev by Date: Re: ramdisk and build time bottle neck
- Next by Date: Re: help on eboot from NAND flash
- Previous by thread: Re: ramdisk and build time bottle neck
- Next by thread: Re: ramdisk and build time bottle neck
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|