Re: Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- From: "Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)" <nospam1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 13:31:03 -0400
I would expect the x86 compiler to use byte instructions since it has them
and ultimately avoid the issue completely. Again I'd have to read the
language spec REAL careful as there are some odd things about stuff like
that,which turn out to be implementation defined. Most books and references
on coding standards and practices all stress the use of casting with regard
to the ~ operator on untyped constants in code.
--
Steve Maillet
EmbeddedFusion
www.EmbeddedFusion.com
smaillet at EmbeddedFusion dot com
.
- References:
- Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- From: gerrit
- Re: Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- From:
- Re: Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- From: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)
- Re: Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- From:
- Re: Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- From:
- Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- Prev by Date: Re: TI PC Card driver + CISCO Aironet 340/350 PCMCIA WLAN Card
- Next by Date: Re: MFC Application in O/S Image
- Previous by thread: Re: Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- Next by thread: Re: Bug in the PB 5.00 ARM compiler? Surely not.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|