Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: "Dean Ramsier" <ramsiernospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 09:06:46 -0400
Correct
--
Dean Ramsier - eMVP
Vibren Technologies
http://www.vibren.com/Products/schema_bsp.htm
"news.microsoft.com" <li.ning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23ywy9LaZFHA.3272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Then you mean that by default in OEMInterruptHander(), interrupt has been
> disabled by the kernel, so it will not be re-enter?
>
>
> "Steve Maillet (eMVP)" <nospam1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:O$z7WFaZFHA.4036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Wrong, Windows CE does support nested interrupts. However YOUR OAL must
> > enable interrupts in OEMInterrupthandler and ALL branches of that
function
> > and any Installable ISRs must be written to take into account that they
> may
> > be executed with interrupts on. This is not enabled by default because
of
> > the added complexity.
> >
> > --
> > Steve Maillet
> > EmbeddedFusion
> > www.EmbeddedFusion.com
> > smaillet at EmbeddedFusion dot com
> >
> >
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: John Eldridge [MSFT]
- Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- References:
- Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: news.microsoft.com
- Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)
- Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: news.microsoft.com
- Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Driver can not be unloaded messages
- Next by Date: Re: Odd call stack
- Previous by thread: Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- Next by thread: Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|