Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: "news.microsoft.com" <li.ning@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:37:17 +0800
Then you mean that by default in OEMInterruptHander(), interrupt has been
disabled by the kernel, so it will not be re-enter?
"Steve Maillet (eMVP)" <nospam1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O$z7WFaZFHA.4036@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Wrong, Windows CE does support nested interrupts. However YOUR OAL must
> enable interrupts in OEMInterrupthandler and ALL branches of that function
> and any Installable ISRs must be written to take into account that they
may
> be executed with interrupts on. This is not enabled by default because of
> the added complexity.
>
> --
> Steve Maillet
> EmbeddedFusion
> www.EmbeddedFusion.com
> smaillet at EmbeddedFusion dot com
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: Dean Ramsier
- Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- References:
- Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: news.microsoft.com
- Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- From: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)
- Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- Next by Date: dot net cf updata
- Previous by thread: Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- Next by thread: Re: Will OEMinterruptHandler be preempted by a higher priority IRQ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|