Re: OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- From: Steven Ke <Steven Ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 20:26:02 -0700
Hi Paul:
Only OID_802_11_XXX OIDs appear in the sample driver you mentioned..
I don't see any OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs.
(I work with the 5.0 Platform Builder).
Does this mean the support of the OID_DOT11_XXX set is optional?
Or these OIDs are not implemented in the miniport driver?
Thanks.
"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" wrote:
> You need to use them, if you want to let the OS do its configuration of your
> adapter in a 'standard' way, yes. If you're going to have a configuration
> program to set the WEP keys, etc., then you can just look like a regular
> NDIS adapter and that will be fine.
>
> Look at the sample driver for the Cisco 3xx card series in
> \WINCE420\PRIVATE\WINCEOS\COMM\NDISMINI\PCX500 to see what MS did to support
> that card.
>
> Paul T.
>
> "Steven Ke" <Steven Ke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:5A7FC22D-2F29-4609-B03E-1EC19905D886@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Hi:
> >
> > I am going to develop an 802.11 miniport driver on Windows CE.
> > I am migrating from the desktop world.
> > I just learned from the MSDN library that there are some OIDs for 802.11
> > which aren't used by the desktop Windows vesions. These OIDs begin with
> > OID_DOT11_XXX. Are these OIDs mandatory? Does the WLAN configuration
> > utility
> > of Windows CE use these OIDs?
> > Should I support both sets of 802.11OIDs (i.e. OID_802_11_XXX and
> > OID_DOT11_XXX)?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steven
>
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- From: Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
- Re: OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- References:
- OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- From: Steven Ke
- Re: OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- From: Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
- OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- Prev by Date: USB RNDIS Function driver for Magneto?
- Next by Date: Re: How to include OEM SD DDK headers?
- Previous by thread: Re: OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- Next by thread: Re: OID_DOT11_XXX OIDs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|