Re: Threads Per Process. Help!
From: George McCollister (georgem_at_novatech-llc.com)
Date: 09/02/04
- Next message: Bruce Eitman \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Previous message: George McCollister: "Re: Bug in X86 serial port driver in CE.NET 4.2 ?"
- Next in thread: Bruce Eitman \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Reply: Bruce Eitman \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Reply: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:13:38 -0500
Bor-Ming Hsieh wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I'll log a bug for future releases and see if we can
> get this fixed. However, this is really non-trivial for we rely on
> WaitForMultipleObjects to do the waiting. We can certainly bump the limit
> higher, but it would still be a hard limit. The alternative is to break the
> wait into a loop of waits, but then we'll have to take care of race
> condition (thread created/deleted in between the wait loop).
>
> -- Bor-Ming
>
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
> You assume all risk for your use.
> Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
>
> --------------------
> | From: "Steve Maillet \(eMVP\)" <nospam1@EntelechyConsulting.com>
> | References: <et06R3b8DHA.1804@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
> <ululA#b8DHA.1632@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
> <IuUWb.13233$um1.3576@twister.nyroc.rr.com>
> <eRbuGvj8DHA.712@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
> <KrBrdGLAEHA.616@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> <eXQF7$hAEHA.3248@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>
> <Guyz0#MIEHA.660@cpmsftngxa06.phx.gbl>
> <TR75aOgiEHA.2632@cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl>
> <eQ#P19hiEHA.2356@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
> <#yvvrUuiEHA.3896@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl>
> <emY9X6uiEHA.2992@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
> | Subject: Re: Threads Per Process. Help!
> | Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:31:33 -0400
> | Lines: 14
> | X-Priority: 3
> | X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> | X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
> | X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
> | Message-ID: <#P5wQNviEHA.1348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
> | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder
> | NNTP-Posting-Host: ptd-24-198-43-18.maine.rr.com 24.198.43.18
> | Path:
> cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEED01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13
> phx.gbl
> | Xref: cpmsftngxa10.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder:54257
> | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windowsce.platbuilder
> |
> | On the plus side Kernel mode debugging doesn't have this limit (The device
> | manager regularly has more than 64 threads going and that can be debugged
> | readily.)
> |
> | --
> | Steve Maillet
> | EmbeddedFusion
> | www.EmbeddedFusion.com
> |
> | Do have an opinion on the effectiveness of Microsoft Windows Mobile and
> | Embedded newsgroups? Let us know!
> | https://www.windowsembeddedeval.com/community/newsgroups
> |
> |
> |
>
I noticed CE 5.0 has some sort of Dr Watson tool. I have just started
looking in to it. Does running an application with this tool impose the
same 64 thread limit?
Regards,
George McCollister
- Next message: Bruce Eitman \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Previous message: George McCollister: "Re: Bug in X86 serial port driver in CE.NET 4.2 ?"
- Next in thread: Bruce Eitman \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Reply: Bruce Eitman \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Reply: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\): "Re: Threads Per Process. Help!"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|