Re: Bootloader
From: eFrank (eFrank_at_navidrive.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: Sujith: "Re: boot loader build error"
- In reply to: Dean Ramsier: "Re: Bootloader"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:39:02 -0700
Thank you, that is an exclusion of one suspect, the license stamp.
The build of the NK.BIN file works fine on top of AWARD BIOS, DOS, and a Bootloader developed with Microsoft BSP. Since I replaced the BIOS and DOS with my ROM Bootloader, I also missing BIOS functionallity is a suspect.
To optimize boot time, I do not use the BSP to write my ROM Bootloader. I rather write/wrote my complete own code. It might be essential to lern more/find detailed documentation of the hand-off requirements/conditions for WinCE (Entry to the NK.BIN image in RAM) on x86 based platforms. Any hint?
-- Thanks eFrank "Dean Ramsier" wrote: > No, there are no such requirements on CE bootloaders. A failure like this > is could be anything, probably something wrong with the NK itself. > > -- > Dean Ramsier - eMVP > > > "eFrank" <eFrank@navidrive.com> wrote in message > news:BB7B8C20-4F81-4FA4-B505-672F1C0C4B9D@microsoft.com... > > If a NK.BIN file is license stamped, does eBoot/sBoot binaries check for > license stamp? > > > > I am writing a ROM Bootloader without using Platform Builder (eBoot/sBoot > not in my build) and after the hand-off jump to the unpacked and loaded > NK.BIN image in system RAM, Windows CE shows no live sign (debug messages). > I already verified the COM1 connection to my hyperterminal (tested with code > patches at NK.BIN entry point). > > > > Any ideas? > > -- > > Thanks > > eFrank > > >
- Previous message: Sujith: "Re: boot loader build error"
- In reply to: Dean Ramsier: "Re: Bootloader"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]