Re: UCB1400 touch resume
From: Dean Ramsier (ramsiernospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 05/14/04
- Next message: Dean Ramsier: "Re: 1-wire windows ce pio's"
- Previous message: Dean Ramsier: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- In reply to: Charles Wang: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- Next in thread: Charles Wang: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- Reply: Charles Wang: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:39:20 +0100
Not sure what you mean by "wake up touch", but during normal operation touch
causes an interrupt which then gets serviced. When used as a wakeup source,
the bootloader runs first - not an interrupt service routine. So, different
code paths would cause different times.
Why are you concerned?
-- Dean Ramsier - eMVP "Charles Wang" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:91A29E78-E517-472E-A6AF-3CFAC18D0B7C@microsoft.com... > The regular touch on the TOuch Screen cause the TOCUH IRQ togling 400us, but the "wake up touch" togling the TOUCH IRQ 40 ms, which is 100 times of regular touch. How can we reduce/minimize this "togling time"?
- Next message: Dean Ramsier: "Re: 1-wire windows ce pio's"
- Previous message: Dean Ramsier: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- In reply to: Charles Wang: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- Next in thread: Charles Wang: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- Reply: Charles Wang: "Re: UCB1400 touch resume"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|