Re: Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file:
From: Dean Ramsier (dramsiernospam_at_accelentnospam.com)
Date: 04/29/04
- Next message: Rodger Higgins: "Re: Capture unhandled exception"
- Previous message: Dean Ramsier: "Re: can CE display driver support both rotation and directdraw?"
- In reply to: JeffS: "Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file:"
- Next in thread: Jeff S: "Re: Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file:"
- Reply: Jeff S: "Re: Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file:"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 08:45:39 -0400
I don't see anything wrong, what makes you think it isn't working?
-- Dean Ramsier - eMVP Accelent Systems http://www.accelent.com "JeffS" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:5EB0C50C-CC2E-449F-A200-58C438EC1CBA@microsoft.com... > Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file: > If the image is loaded into Flash, the full contiguous 64megs of SDRAM is used (32 megs for the OS > & 28 megs for the RAM). However, when the OS is run directly from the FLASH, still only > 28megs is allocated for the RAM. Why not all 32+28megs? > > > ******From the Bandon (very similar to Cotulla) Config.bib************************** > ; Name|Virtual/Cached |Size| Region Type > MEMORY > IF IMGFLASH ! > IF IMGRECOVERY ! > NK 80288000 02000000 RAMIMAGE ; SDRAM 32MB: [8028 8000 -> 8228 7FFF] > ELSE ; IMGRECOVERY ! > NK 80289000 001C0000 RAMIMAGE > ENDIF ; IMGRECOVERY ! > RAM 82288000 01A30000 RAM ; SDRAM 28MB: [8228 8000 -> 83CB 7FFF] > EDBG 83F8D000 00020000 RESERVED ; x20000 for EBOOT - 3 mem pools of 24K > ENDIF > > > IF IMGFLASH > IF BUILD_ROM_BIN > NK 98380000 01F80000 RAMIMAGE ; FLASH 32MB - 0x80000: Locate above EBOT > ENDIF > IF BUILD_ROM_NB0 > NK 98300000 01E00000 RAMIMAGE ; FLASH 32MB - Replace EBOOT Image > ENDIF > > RAM 820B8000 01C00000 RAM ; SDRAM 28MB: [820B 8000 -> 83CB 7FFF] > ENDIF > > > *****Proposed Change********************************************** > > If the image is running in flash, should'nt config.bib be changed : > > IF IMGFLASH > IF BUILD_ROM_BIN > NK 98380000 01F80000 RAMIMAGE ; FLASH 32MB - 0x80000: Locate above EBOT > ENDIF > IF BUILD_ROM_NB0 > NK 98300000 01E00000 RAMIMAGE ; FLASH 32MB - Replace EBOOT Image > ENDIF > > RAM 800B8000 03C00000 RAM ; SDRAM 28MB+32MB: [800B8000->83CB7FFF] > ENDIF > > I tried this but could not get winCE to recognize the extra 32megs as RAM. This seems > amazing since it works correctly when it boots CE from the SDRAM. This would seem > to imply that all the low level stuff, memmap.inc, etc are set correctly to recognize > the full 64megs of SDRAM. > > Thanks in advance for any input, Jeff >
- Next message: Rodger Higgins: "Re: Capture unhandled exception"
- Previous message: Dean Ramsier: "Re: can CE display driver support both rotation and directdraw?"
- In reply to: JeffS: "Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file:"
- Next in thread: Jeff S: "Re: Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file:"
- Reply: Jeff S: "Re: Question on Bandon / Lubbock Config.bib file:"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|