Re: This application requires a newer version of the .NET Compact

Yes, trying to install a second instance of the framework doesn't work well,
unless the version is really different (3.5 over 2.0, 2.0 over 1.0, etc.)
I'm not sure if this is because of some critical file that the install would
like to replace being in ROM or what. You'll get really strange effects if
you have 2.0 in the device ROM and try to install 1.0.

Paul T.

"Franco Melandri" <FrancoMelandri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:1747E71E-98C6-481E-B3A3-415BDE78EFA7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you for the quick answer.
The really strange thing is that it is not possible to install the .NET
Compact framework on the device using the cab file; the installation
process
notify me the framework is already installed, so it seems it was all ok,
but
the application doesn't work....

--
-------------------------
Franco Melandri
-------------------------


"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" wrote:

Did you do a Clean Sysgen operation after changing the catalog
configuration? That seems like enough QFEs to give you what you'd need,
but
there's no reason to stop with just the 2007 QFE set; install January,
February, and March, too.

Paul T.

"Franco Melandri" <Franco Melandri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message news:93FD6DEB-E092-4610-A2CF-A8FE4D2D16CA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi to all,
I had installed the PB5 and I had updated it with the cumulative pack
of
the
31/12/2007; then i built an OS image with the .NET compact frameowrk
2.0
component but when i try to launch a small application developed using
VS2005
I receive back an exception reporting the error in the subject.
Where is the error? Anyone have an idea?
Thanks in dvance.
Franco.





.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bitter about [Lack of] .Net Framework Deployment
    ... We built a very nice auto-update framework, ... the 30-60 minute range to install. ... Also, the user's perception is reality - and our app install sucks, ... deploying 3.0 application, so I've not paid that close attention. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: userName="machine" didnt work
    ... to unregister my 1.1 framework do you? ... ASP.NET and .Net Framework versions installed? ... Neither of them have a user specified in their processModel. ... Did you install ASP.NET from SBS disks? ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.aspnet)
  • Re: ServiceModelReg fails in installation of WCF
    ... file from a system on which 3.5 framework, ... (those people had to format the whole OS and then install this 3.5 ... securityInformation, SecurityIdentifier owner, SecurityIdentifier ... streamName, Boolean success, Object writeContext, Boolean ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework)
  • Re: building my .exe can it run anywhere?
    ... Then there are those who have a very fast ADSL connection ... I agree that it is probably safe to target framework 2.0 these days. ... At the end of the day, the question is: What is the .Net Framework ... if it is not installed download and install this from the MS website ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.vb)
  • Re: There is no .NET in Vista Code?
    ... concern at serious flaws we see in the design of the framework. ... I don't remember Joel's rant as asking specific questions but mostly complaints but if the question was "why can't I have a linker" then I gave an answer to that question but I didn't say you would agree. ... As for my immediately jumping to negative conclusion - give me a break - upon reading his article I knew he didn't have a valid point about absolutely needing Microsoft to supply a linker. ... Of course I can't guarantee what may or may not be on someone's machine but I damn well can have my app test and report what's on his machine and make recommendations if they need to install the runtime. ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)