Re: Developing a driver targeting both 5.0 and 6.0

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry



You might be able to write certain types of drivers in a form that would
work in both. If I recall, WM6 is not based on Windows CE 6, but on CE5,
no? If so, there should be no problem targeting WM5 and having that same
driver work with WM6, in most cases. There will always be exceptions, of
course. If I'm wrong and WM6 is based on CE6, I think you're out of luck.

Paul T.

"elysion" <elysion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:12DC79D8-F920-4437-9AC5-9E576F2996A4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,

From what I understood from the Microsoft's help files, tutorials and
videos, the drivers in CE 5.0 and CE 6.0 are quite different, so you can't
just use the same binary you used in CE 5.0 in CE 6.0. Also I haven't
found
any switch in PB6 to tell the compilers and linkers to build the driver
for
CE 5, so I guess you would need to get the PB5 also. But I'm no pro in
these
things, so a lot of this is just guessing. Hope someone else has more
solid
info for you :).

"Tom" wrote:

If someone wants to develop a driver that will work on both Windows
Mobile
5.0 and 6.0, are both Platform Builder 5.0 and 6.0 needed?

If the answer depends on the driver, it would be nice to know that. For
example, if in some cases, PB 6.0 can be used for DD development
targeting
both CE 5.0 and 6.0, while in other cases it cannot target both, knowing
that
would be helpful. Then the answer is a matter of finding out what areas
of DD
development we're touching upon.

If the binaries are different, or something is so different across the
board
that one would never target CE 5.0 with PB 6.0, that would be helpful to
know
as well. (I'd find this "across the board" incompatibility hard to
understand
since I'm guessing that some drivers from 5.0 must be usuable on 6.0, but
that's just my guess.)

If there are any good Inet or Msoft articles, it would be great to have a
URL.

I'm trying to avoid purchasing both PB 5.0 and 6.0 if only PB 5.0 is
needed.
Or, if PB 6.0 supports development of CE 5.0 compliant drivers, there's
no
need to invest in PB 5.0. Hopefully the purpose of my question makes
sense.

Thanks in advance!

Regards,
Tom


.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: Is explorer.exe (XP) a high risk process
    ... the graphical shell and start menu and desktop and file manager. ... I can imagine lots of viruses would target it because of how important it ... weird seemingly unrelated problem needing to be fixed-ie drivers. ... How did you work out that viruses are targeting this process? ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • Re: EMU 1616 Compression plugin?
    ... > software glitches that don't grind my sessions to a halt but cause me ... > problem may be related to Cubase. ... Hi Tom ... Try the new 1.81 drivers as they seem to have sorted out the glitches ...
    (rec.audio.pro)
  • Re: Poor 2D performance problems ..
    ... > The only thing that looks weird to me is the two mouse drivers getting ... Tom ... >> my laptop X server. ... >> and no one seemed to care. ...
    (comp.os.linux.x)
  • Re: RIS "unable to format partition" error
    ... Thanks for the tip, Tom. ... Have you tried the Win2k drivers for the Intel 100VE in your image? ... I am using a Windows 2003 server as my ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
  • Re: HP LaserJet 1000 (WinXP x64)
    ... And Tom would know all about this issue! ... (MS-MVP Printing & Imaging) ... > and not every hardware supplier has developed and released drivers for it. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.print_fax)