Re: CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- From: "Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" <p space tobey no spam AT no instrument no spam DOT com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 09:17:03 -0700
If you can't figure out how to write a program, starting at the beginning in
the help is going to be more effective than asking someone who does that in
their sleep to give you a tutorial. You do know how to write code in C? If
so, the new project wizard in Platform Builder/VS2005 should guide you
enough to do it, although you'll have to look up SignalStarted() and
CreateProcess() in the help.
Paul T.
"rainer" <rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:FFD575A6-9B07-4A62-B8CA-9ABFCB4C84FD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you for your help, but I'm not really able to do that. I'm not
really
familiar with winCE 6.0. Perhaps you can give me a step by step
instruction???
"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" wrote:
For example, creating a new program that you write. This program would
understand that its parameter is likely to be a number and would, once it
starts up, call CreateProcess() to launch cmd.exe, and then, presumably,
call SignalStarted() with the number.
Paul T.
"Paul Monson" <paulm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eE0BlBWzHHA.4276@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You'll need to start it some other way
Check out this blog entry
http://blogs.msdn.com/mikehall/archive/2007/01/04/ce-6-0-booting-processes-with-command-line-options.aspx
Paul Monson
Intrinsyc
rainer wrote:
Thank you for your help, but how can I change that now and what must I
change?
Rainer
"Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]" wrote:
Because, when you run a program using the Init key in the registry,
the
program gets its XX number from LaunchXX on the command line. It has
to
get this so that it can call SignalStarted with the number and the
system will know that anything depending on XX can now be launched
(that's how the Depend list is handled). However, you're trying to
start cmd.exe this way and it will interpret the content of its
command
line as a program to be executed. Since there's no program called
"50",
you get that error.
Paul T.
"rainer" <rainer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:D37B2193-CB91-45AB-85EE-BDB003674288@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,
I have included Command Processor and Command Window Console in my
image and
i use the serial port as the console for the device.
I have made the following changes:
project.reg File
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Drivers\Console]
"OutputTo" = dword:1
"COMSpeed" = dword:1C200
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\init]
"Launch50"="cmd.exe"
"Depend50"=hex:0A,00,14,00,1E
bsp_cfg.h File:
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Debug OUTPUT
// DEBUG_PORT specifies which UART we use for debug serial port. It
must be
one
// of the following :
// DBG_UART1
// DBG_SC16C652_PORTA
// DBG_SC16C652_PORTB
//------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. define DBG_UART1 1
2. define DBG_SC16C652_PORTA 4
3. define DBG_SC16C652_PORTB 5
//#define DEBUG_PORT DBG_SC16C652_PORTA
//#define DEBUG_PORT DBG_UART1
I use HyperTerminal to see what the device sends via the serial
port.
When I start the device I see the following message on the
HyperTerminal
screen:
-EbootSendBootmeAndWaitForTftp
BL_IMAGE_TYPE_BIN
INFO: OEMMultiBINNotify (dwNumRegions = 1, dwRegionStart =
0x88100000).
INFO: OEMVerifyMemory (CA = 0x88100000, PA = 0x80100000, length =
0x6F8AC4)
INFO: Downloading NK RAM image.
rom_offset=0x0.
ImageStart = 0x88100000, ImageLength = 0x6F8AC4, LaunchAddr =
0x88101000
Completed file(s):
Address=0x88100000 Length=0x6F8AC4 Name="" Target=RAM
ROMHDR at Address 88100044h
Download successful! Jumping to image at 0x88101000 (physical
0x80101000)...
INFO: EbootWaitForHostConnect (IP = 128.131.81.37, MAC =
12-9-11-CF-8C-95,
Port
= 0xD403)
Got EDBG_CMD_JUMPIMG
Got EDBG_CMD_CONFIG, flags:0x00000000
Unrecognized option 50.
Now I want to know why I get this Unrecognized option 50 and how I
can
change that?!??
Thanks,
Rainer
.
- References:
- CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- From: rainer
- Re: CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- From: Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
- Re: CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- From: rainer
- Re: CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- From: Paul Monson
- Re: CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- From: Paul G. Tobey [eMVP]
- Re: CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- From: rainer
- CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- Prev by Date: Re: Bug in CE-6.0 memory management ?
- Next by Date: Re: Win CETK
- Previous by thread: Re: CE6.0 Unrecognized option
- Next by thread: Bringing Up Persistence Storage
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|