Re: Soap Service Speeds

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

From: John Spaith [MS] (jspaith_at_ONLINE.microsoft.com)
Date: 03/16/05

  • Next message: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\): "Re: Soap Service Speeds"
    Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:24:38 -0800
    
    

    It would be interesting to know where the bottleneck here is. If it's a
    100MhZ CPU, it's possible that IE doing all the magic it does may be all the
    time is being taken. Or perhaps SOAP is stealing say %95 of the CPU and you
    don't notice it across eithernet, but IE trying to use the remaining %5 of
    the CPU ends up being slow.

    CE IE is a pretty close port of desktop IE so I'd be surprised if there was
    something really silly in our handeling causing this. I start with trying
    to profile to see if it's a CPU thing or if the CPU really is idle and
    there's just random waits.

    -- 
    John Spaith
    Software Design Engineer, Windows CE
    Microsoft Corporation
    Check out the new CE Networking Team Blog at http://blogs.msdn.com/cenet/.
    This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
    You assume all risk for your use. © 2003 Microsoft Corporation. All rights
    reserved.
    "Artist" <artist@sj.speakeasy.net> wrote in message
    news:moWdndahD8aLQKnfRVn-ig@speakeasy.net...
    > My CE .NET 4.2 target has SOAP methods that are consumed by JavaScript
    > code in a webpage. The target is connected to an ethernet network.
    >
    > When this SOAP service consuming webpage the target serves is viewed on
    > the target itself using http://localhost/ to load into the browser it
    > takes a lot longer to display than when this same page is viewed on a
    > workstation on the network. On the target a lot of time is spent in Ready
    > State 1 (loading) whereas on the workstation this state is passed through
    > instantly. This is the opposite of what I expected. This means it can
    > serve the information to the ethernet faster than it can to itself. Why
    > would Ready State 1 take longer on the target than the workstation? Can
    > anything be done to speed it up on the target?
    >
    > The target is a 100MHz SAT-520Plus board.
    > http://sbc.winsystems.com/products/sbcs/sat520plus.html
    >
    

  • Next message: Steve Maillet \(eMVP\): "Re: Soap Service Speeds"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Unable to install 8.x on a PowerEdge R810
      ... INTR: Adding local APIC 1 as a target ... cpu: APIC ID: 82 ... CPU 1 has ACPI ID 25 ...
      (freebsd-stable)
    • Re: perf_counters issue with PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP
      ... How useful is that last model, especially why only one CPU? ... have already seen requests for accessing chipsets, and seems GPU ... Chipset and GPU measurements are very much possible via perfcounters ... target parameters to sys_perf_counter_open. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: perf_counters issue with PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP
      ... How useful is that last model, especially why only one CPU? ... have already seen requests for accessing chipsets, and seems GPU ... Chipset and GPU measurements are very much possible via perfcounters ... target parameters to sys_perf_counter_open. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: embedded linux on FPGA?
      ... My first bit of advice is take what you get on these ... to a 'bare' the target via the parallel port. ... > CPU; ... > I'm an ASIC engineer by training, ...
      (comp.arch.embedded)
    • Re: 2003 Server slowed to a crawl
      ... click Processes then CPU column to sort by ... Investigate a possible Network problem (is there a broadcast storm ... >> method for telling the computer's processor that it needs attention. ... >> which have signed drivers (such hardware is sold with a Microsoft Windows ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.general)