Re: Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- From: "Octavio" <inquirer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:00:05 -0500
Yes, I made a mistake with the dates and sequence, you are right.
Assuming that there is nothing wrong now with leaving these there, any objections to that, or any adverse future outcome? Or should I uninstall all of them and reinstall it once?
Please advise.
"Shenan Stanley" <newshelper@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:uwg31$vdIHA.2484@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Octavio wrote:.The following are shown in my computer under my "View Updates
History" list:
Windows Live Toolbar 3.01
Windows Live One Care Family Safety
Windows Live Sign-in Assistant
Windows Live Writer
The list indicates that the first "Successful" installation was on
2/16/2008, and the second also "Successful" installation was two
days later on 2/12/2008.
Why the installation twice?
I'm confused by the description...
Your time travels faster than mine and in reverse...
"... first ... on 2/16/2008 ..." then "... two days later on 2/12/2008 ..."
Four days difference, in reverse. Not two days forward.
Have you misread or misquoted something?
Those could be manually installed by the way. It is possibly you (or anyone else who utilizes the computer - if anyone) could have installed it, and installed it again. Those are also *optional* updates - so you would have to initate the install I am pretty sure.
http://www.windowslive.com/
--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- From: Shenan Stanley
- Re: Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- References:
- Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- From: Octavio
- Re: Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- From: Shenan Stanley
- Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- Prev by Date: Re: kb947172 update failing - vista
- Next by Date: Re: Cursor Jump!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- Next by thread: Re: Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|