Re: Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express 6 Service Pack 1 (KB837009)



Here is what I have found:

WABMIG.EXE REGRESSED
WABIMP.DLL *NEWER VERSION
WABFIND.DLL REGRESSED
WAB32.DLL *NEWER VERSION
WAB.EXE REGRESSED
Msoert2.dll regressed
Msoeacct.dll regressed
MSOE.exe *NEWER VERSION
inetcomm.dll *NEWER VERSION

*Newer version than what was listed in the manifest, whereas REGRESSED was
an older version. The rest of the file versions matched.


"Robert Aldwinckle" <robald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eAFfqYbNFHA.604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Home User" <Home_User@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:114mqf1hmc5v140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I checked out the info relative to Microsoft Security Bulletin MS04-018:
> > Cumulative Security Update for Outlook Express (823353). It states
Windows
> > Millennium Edition is not critically affected by any of the
vulnerabilities
> > that are addressed in this security bulletin. Question: Is it still your
> > recommendation to expand Security Update Information and Outlook Express
6
> > SP1 for Windows XP, Windows XP SP1, Windows 2000 SP3, Windows 2000 SP4,
and
> > Windows NT 4.0 SP6a to see the file manifest? Would it even be possible
to
> > check on the versions of *all* those modules listed, since it doesn't
apply
> > to Windows ME? I'm puzzled...
>
> Definitely. It is a list of modules and they are modules which you have.
> The versions of those modules that you have will indicate to us what
> update you have applied. If it is as I suspect that your case is similar
> to Joann's one of those modules will be regressed to a version which is
> pre-837009 and that is the reason that you are getting that update
> continually reoffered. Then what would happen is that it couldn't be
> applied because you already have a superseding update applied:
> 823353 + 887797.
>
> BTW if your msinfo32 tool is at all similar to XP's you may find
> that using its list of loaded modules is the easiest way to compile
> your version of that list. E.g. in XP I can open the tool at that list
> by Run... (e.g. Win-R and enter:) msinfo32 /category
SWEnvLoadedModules
> Then the contents of that list operates as a standard multiple selection
> list. E.g. select an element and copy it to ClipBoard with Ctrl-c
> or select several elements by pressing a the Ctrl- key each time
> one is selected and then copy the combined selection. Etc.
>
> If you'd rather not bother collect the necessary diagnostics
> which prove the reason for your problem you could guess
> that the reason is understood (as explained above) and then
> just uninstall the above two updates (at least) in the hope that
> doing that would create a more consistent set of those modules.
> (E.g. in the event that the hypothetical regressed module was
> one of the ones which was updated by either of those updates
> uninstalling them would restore the previous version of it
> which would likely be a non-regressed version. So far AFAIK
> nobody has a theory as to why so many people seem to have
> regressed versions of one of more of those modules.)
>
>
> HTH
>
> Robert
> ---
>
>


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Born To Run: What Humans Really Evolved To Do
    ... The only reason that matters in a selective scenario is who lives and ... Your reason havre to involve biological selection. ... the locals would come looking for it. ... What is an "auto-catalytic selective process. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Born To Run: What Humans Really Evolved To Do
    ... You have to construct a selective scenario. ... The only reason that matters in a selective scenario is who lives and ... Your reason havre to involve biological selection. ... What is an "auto-catalytic selective process. ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • Re: Born To Run: What Humans Really Evolved To Do
    ... There's no reason for them to fight. ... We're talking about a transition from apes to hominids, ... My reasons are, of course, based entirely on selection. ... autocatalytic selective process despite the fact they were unable to ...
    (sci.anthropology.paleo)
  • problem with the path tool
    ... clicked "Selection from Path", which of course was the ultimate goal. ... I did notice that there are some "holes" in the path, ... It seems that for some reason I created several components for this path. ... Can two seperate components be reunited? ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.gimp)
  • Re: automatic updates fail to download
    ... I am missing 123 updates. ... if Microsoft can "read" my ... Can you think of any reason this is happening? ... right> Scroll down towards the very bottom of the list> Write down the last four "Security Update for Windows XP " listed and their installation date, then post this information in a reply to this thread. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)