Re: Same Windows Updates
From: Robert Aldwinckle (robald_at_techemail.com)
Date: 12/05/04
- Next message: Robert Aldwinckle: "Re: Windows Update & SP2...."
- Previous message: Maureen Goldman: "Can't run sfc /scannow since SP2 (PC came with Restore Disk)"
- In reply to: dak: "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Next in thread: dak: "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Reply: dak: "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Reply: Torgeir Bakken \(MVP\): "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 00:59:34 -0500
"dak" <microsoft-public-windowsupdate@spamtrap.cjb.net> wrote in message
news:1sq2r0hde8a3svdld8m86iloh0mpqf25bs@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2004 23:33:43 -0600, "lvee" <notmesothere@msn.com> wrote:
>
>>The link below is for Windows XP, as this is a XP newsgroup, not Win 2000,
>
> This newsgroup is "microsoft.public.windowsupdate" which is not
> Operating System specific. Checking the headers of both your reply and
> the original post the only newsgroup I see listed in either one is this
> newsgroup. No evidence of multi- or cross-posting that I can see.
> Guess you took a wrong turn somewhere.... :o)
Not really. I made the same point to a W2K user this week.
The thing is that there is so much focus in here on WUv5 issues
that WUv4 nuances are overlooked and forgotten about.
Assuming there is some kind of traffic in the win2000.windows_update
newsgroup W2K users are therefore likely to see more relevant
discussions there than here.
Robert Aldwinckle
---
- Next message: Robert Aldwinckle: "Re: Windows Update & SP2...."
- Previous message: Maureen Goldman: "Can't run sfc /scannow since SP2 (PC came with Restore Disk)"
- In reply to: dak: "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Next in thread: dak: "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Reply: dak: "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Reply: Torgeir Bakken \(MVP\): "Re: Same Windows Updates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|