Re: Critical Updates vs. Security Updates
From: Jim Byrd (jrbyrd_at_spamlessadelphia.net)
Date: 08/26/04
- Next message: henry baker: "Re: SP2 - Why all the fuss?"
- Previous message: indil: "Windows Update hangs at 0%"
- In reply to: Bob Fliegel: "Re: Critical Updates vs. Security Updates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 13:59:56 -0700
Hi Bob - You might be able to figure out what you need using this tool:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/current.aspx
-- Please respond in the same thread. Regards, Jim Byrd, MS-MVP In news:B559EFD2-2307-4A2C-959B-46E5D38863A8@microsoft.com, Bob Fliegel <rfliegel@se.rr.com> typed: > For some reason, I'm not making myself clear. I will try again. > > I want to go back through my installed updates to determine which of > those that were not security related were nonetheless designated > "critical." My question is this: exactly WHERE in the associated KB > article will I find mention of the fact that that particular update > was "critical"? > > "Alan" wrote: > >> Bob Fliegel wrote: >> >>> Alan, that was my understanding, too. What I would like to know, >>> though, is where in the KB article that relates to a NON-security >>> related critical update does one find reference to the fact that >>> it's "critical"? >>> >>> -- Bob >>> >>> "Alan" wrote: >>> >>>> Bob Fliegel wrote: >>>>> Though I've asked this question twice before, I've yet to receive >>>>> an answer. One more try. Perhaps if I word it differently, some >>>>> MVP will know what I'm talking about. >>>>> >>>>> Is "critical update" synonomous with "security update"? Stated >>>>> otherwise, are there any critical updates that are not security >>>>> related? If so, where in the KB article associated with the >>>>> latter would one find reference to its being critical? I noticed >>>>> that on the XP home page reference is made to "critical security >>>>> updates." This leads me to infer that some security updates may >>>>> not be "critical." Otherwise, the term is redundant. I do hope >>>>> someone understands my question. >>>> Based on my understanding of Microsoft terminology, security >>>> updates are always critical updates as they relate to security >>>> vulnerabilities. Critical updates are not always security >>>> updates. Microsoft will release critical updates to fix known >>>> issues arising with the use of their software. Most of the ones >>>> I have seen relate to fixing software bugs that arise from their >>>> release of a product service pack. >>>> >> I need to modifiy my response. Critical updates fix what >> Microsoft deems to be critical non-security related bugs in their >> offerings. Security updates are issued to fix security >> vulnerabilities. All security updates are not critical. >> Microsoft rates them either as critical, important, moderate or low.
- Next message: henry baker: "Re: SP2 - Why all the fuss?"
- Previous message: indil: "Windows Update hangs at 0%"
- In reply to: Bob Fliegel: "Re: Critical Updates vs. Security Updates"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|