Re: SP3

From: Peter (0spam0)
Date: 08/25/04 

Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 07:50:08 -0400

P.S. I spoke too soon - I do have a minor problem. Windows wont shut
down - but only in safe mode - have to do it manually...weird. (No processes
running) 

-- 
Peter.
Toronto, Canada.
Windows XP Home SP2.
Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR.
"Carlos" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
news:59ec01c48a76$3c008ea0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
Peter,
Actually my problem is not with SP2 that installed without
any issue. But the new V5 software is giving me a hard
time. I have tried many things and gotten different
suggestion from MS but so far nothing worked. I will fix
it, that's written in the stone but has taken, and will
take, B, S & T and that's what, I guess, we all dislike.
Don't have to apologize. Your point of views are so valid
as mine and this is a free MS world, isn't it?
>-----Original Message-----
>Sorry, you are right I suppose.  I can't sit here
gloating because I have
>had no problems with RTM SP2.  Actually I did have a
problem with the RC2
>version, so I'll eat humble pie and shut up.
>
>-- 
>Peter.
>Toronto, Canada.
>Windows XP Home SP2.
>Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR.
>"Carlos" <Carlos@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:FB589CBC-642E-47A7-B8E8-772C8269D63D@microsoft.com...
>> Peter,
>>
>> If you´ve read well, I said "Bug/PSs free to an
accetable level". There
>> might be people who do not read the small foot print or
surf dangerously
>> as
>> you said but there are also others who update their
system on time, who
>> keep
>> everything tidy, and who suddenly, after everything was
working right,
>> suffer
>> a new forced windows update software (if they wished to
continue being
>> able
>> to update Windows)  which is so loaded with bugs that
you have what you
>> see
>> here now. I do not say it, you can see the avalanche of
posts here,
>> describing the same, either problems with V5 or with
SP2. Do not be blind,
>> or
>> pretend you are.
>>
>> Microsoft has been "beta testing" V5 and SP2 for a long
time, how is it
>> possible such a bunch of trouble now? Do you justify
it? If yes pal, God,
>> don´t know what to tell you.
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>> "Peter" wrote:
>>
>>> No system ever will be totally bug-free.    There are
always people out
>>> there whose aim in life is to screw up other peoples'
systems, and there
>>> are
>>> also software manufacturers who will always be slow
off the mark to make
>>> their software compatible with any new
system/upgrade.  There will also
>>> always be people who don't read the small print first
before downloading
>>> anything and suffer the consequences, and those who
always surf
>>> dangerously
>>> yet refuse to install adequate protection...the list
goes on.
>>> Personally my PC is much more stable since SP2.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Peter.
>>> Toronto, Canada.
>>> Windows XP Home SP2.
>>> Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR.
>>> <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:51ca01c489ee$a4815e60$a301280a@phx.gbl...
>>> > Might be too late then.
>>> >
>>> > And even, will this Looooonhorn be bug/SPs free? I
mean,
>>> > to an acceptable level?
>>> >>-----Original Message-----
>>> >>Considering there are over 100 million users of XP
these
>>> > are a drop ni the
>>> >>bucket... and the "new whole...(?)" would be
Longhorn,
>>> > due out around 2008.
>>> >>
>>> >>-- 
>>> >>Peter.
>>> >>Toronto, Canada.
>>> >>Windows XP Home SP2.
>>> >>Pentium4 Dual HT @ 3.0ghz, 160gb HD, 1gb DDR.
>>> >><anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>>> >>news:c66901c489e8$1da35d40$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>>> >>> Just having a look at the piles of cases with the
same
>>> >>> problem (Bugs in Windows update) makes me think
that the
>>> >>> solution won't be Windows Update V6 nor XP SP3 but
a new
>>> >>> whole.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thinking about last Tarantino's movie.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>.
>>> >>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>.
>

Relevant Pages