Re: Error 0X800C0005
From: George Hester (hesterloli_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 02/16/04
- Next message: maureen: "windows update"
- Previous message: Gary Whitley [MSFT]: "Re: KB832483 MDAC Critical patch problem"
- In reply to: nastyguy: "Re: Error 0X800C0005"
- Next in thread: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: Error 0X800C0005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:01:25 -0500
That's OK it happens. We do the weirdest things when we're fatigued.
I have a fix for this issue it seems but as you got it fixed I'd love to know what you did. Thx.
-- George Hester __________________________________ "nastyguy" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:1046601c3f41e$fec6bf20$a301280a@phx.gbl... > I apologized for my nasiness in another post, and I'm > happy to say that the machine I'm working on (fixed, see > other post) isn't mine. I build all my own machines, and > run various flavors of *nix on most of them, but I'm still > wondering how her post was useful. The original poster > couldn't complete the transaction at the Windows Update > site, and gets error 0x800C0005, and instead of offering a > fix, sends him to a couple of secure web sites, which > almost certainly won't load. This reminded me of techs I > used to work with at a call center who handled large > volumes of service calls, satisfying the true motive of > the company which was profit not service, by telling > customers to run scandisk regardless of the nature of the > problem. Those customers always called back, and unless > they got somebody who actually helped them fix their > problem, would ultimately be 'escalated' when they called > back for the fifth time and were furious with > the 'service' they'd been getting. > That and my frustration with the problem plus great > fatigue caused me to post what I did, which was obviously > even less useful, but felt good at the moment. > No harm was intended, just expressing frustration. > Apologies again to any I may have offended. > > -- > /maybe quitting the meds was not such a good idea/ > -- > > >-----Original Message----- > >You are nasty. Her post was useful. You really deserve > what you have. > > > >-- > >George Hester > >__________________________________ > >"dump win98 use linux mozilla all free" > <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:1093601c3f39e$107e97a0$a401280a@phx.gbl... > >> ...and if you can't access the sites you refer to, then > >> what? I've tried various settings for SSL, and nothing > >> works. I even tried following the broken english > >> directions posted after your useless post. > >> > >> windows sucks > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >This may be due to SSL > >> > > >> >Are you able to access the following SSL enabled sites? > >> >https://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.asp > >> > > >> >SSL Test page: > >> > >https://www.stanford.edu/group/idg/leland/samples/secure/t > >> est.html > >> > > >> > > >> >-- > >> >Thanks, > >> >Lucy [MSFT] > >> > > >> >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, > and > >> confers no rights. > >> > > >> > > >> >"Steve" <oicsjo@grandecom.net> wrote in message > >> >news:103e201c3f275$27c73d10$a601280a@phx.gbl... > >> >> > >> >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >> >HOW DO I FIX THESE CAN'T FIND A SOLUTION > >> >> > > >> >> >THANKS > >> >> >. > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > >> >. > >> > > >. > >
- Next message: maureen: "windows update"
- Previous message: Gary Whitley [MSFT]: "Re: KB832483 MDAC Critical patch problem"
- In reply to: nastyguy: "Re: Error 0X800C0005"
- Next in thread: Jupiter Jones [MVP]: "Re: Error 0X800C0005"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
