Re: Error 0X800C0005

From: nastyguy (anonymous_at_discussions.microsoft.com)
Date: 02/15/04


Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:54:05 -0800

I apologized for my nasiness in another post, and I'm
happy to say that the machine I'm working on (fixed, see
other post) isn't mine. I build all my own machines, and
run various flavors of *nix on most of them, but I'm still
wondering how her post was useful. The original poster
couldn't complete the transaction at the Windows Update
site, and gets error 0x800C0005, and instead of offering a
fix, sends him to a couple of secure web sites, which
almost certainly won't load. This reminded me of techs I
used to work with at a call center who handled large
volumes of service calls, satisfying the true motive of
the company which was profit not service, by telling
customers to run scandisk regardless of the nature of the
problem. Those customers always called back, and unless
they got somebody who actually helped them fix their
problem, would ultimately be 'escalated' when they called
back for the fifth time and were furious with
the 'service' they'd been getting.
That and my frustration with the problem plus great
fatigue caused me to post what I did, which was obviously
even less useful, but felt good at the moment.
No harm was intended, just expressing frustration.
Apologies again to any I may have offended.

--
/maybe quitting the meds was not such a good idea/
--
>-----Original Message-----
>You are nasty.  Her post was useful.   You really deserve 
what you have.
>
>-- 
>George Hester
>__________________________________
>"dump win98 use linux mozilla all free" 
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message 
news:1093601c3f39e$107e97a0$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> ...and if you can't access the sites you refer to, then 
>> what? I've tried various settings for SSL, and nothing 
>> works. I even tried following the broken english 
>> directions posted after your useless post.
>> 
>> windows sucks
>> 
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >This may be due to SSL
>> >
>> >Are you able to access the following SSL enabled sites?
>> >https://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/en/default.asp
>> >
>> >SSL Test page:
>> 
>https://www.stanford.edu/group/idg/leland/samples/secure/t
>> est.html
>> >
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >Thanks,
>> >Lucy [MSFT]
>> >
>> >This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, 
and 
>> confers no rights.
>> >
>> >
>> >"Steve" <oicsjo@grandecom.net> wrote in message
>> >news:103e201c3f275$27c73d10$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>> >>
>> >> >-----Original Message-----
>> >> >HOW DO I FIX THESE CAN'T FIND A SOLUTION
>> >> >
>> >> >THANKS
>> >> >.
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >
>.
>


Relevant Pages

  • Re: Error 0X800C0005
    ... I have a fix for this issue it seems but as you got it fixed I'd love to know what you did. ... > fatigue caused me to post what I did, ... just expressing frustration. ... I've tried various settings for SSL, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsupdate)
  • RE: DataSet Losing Data when Column Name Contains Colon
    ... before writing the xml, and before reading it - then just change them back ... apologies again for the last post:) ... > The FIX was posted in late 2003, but I have not seen any resolution to ... > dataset (its datatables, rather) have appropriate structures. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.framework.adonet)
  • Re: SSLServer crashes when non-essl telnet connection is made
    ... You were absolutely correct in that I was getting an SSL exception, ... this is not a universal fix. ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: Problem with OWA, SSL & Public Folders.
    ... > yet to see an explaination or a fix. ... Two server site. ... If I require SSL, ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)
  • Problem with OWA, SSL & Public Folders.
    ... see an explaination or a fix. ... Exchange 2000 w/latest patches. ... Two server site. ... great as long as I don't require SSL. ...
    (microsoft.public.exchange.admin)