Re: can TS be used for restricted access to 1 application
- From: "Jeff Pitsch" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:46:18 -0400
You mean a full desktop but access to only one application? Absolutely.
it's a "simple" matter of locking down the desktop and OS. Nothing has
changed there but maybe a bit easier now with new GPO's etc. I'm still
looking through the GPO's myself......
--
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
"RoLaAus" <RobertLAustin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7b346a0a-aa54-4e34-85a7-0ccc0fe340e5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
It sounds like I would need to go with Windows 2008 TS. I am familiar
with the start-up options for earlier versions of Terminal Services,
where you can automatically start applications/programs.
I don't believe I was specific enough in my original post. What I'm
looking for is a way to have someone remote into the server and ONLY
be allowed to run a specific (custom made .NET) program/application.
Is this still a possibility in TS 2008?
Thanks again, and sorry for being too vague the first time.
On Aug 17, 5:02 am, "Jeff Pitsch" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Windows 2008 has a new feature called remoteapp that allows a remote
application from terminal services to run on the end point and it look
slike
a normal desktop application.
All version of TS have the ability to run applications directly as a
window
within a window. the application can be assigned per user account, by
Group
Policy, and at the msts client level.
--
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
"RoLaAus" <RobertLAus...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:80b341a7-5122-4d41-b6fc-66fbcf77b2e8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello all,
New to this group, but I've been a programmer (mainly small time
database stuff) for about 15 years.
I am wondering if it is possible to allow a remote connection to be
established to Windows Server, that is only permiited to run 1
application?
What I have is a client I am programming for and they do not want
thier clients to have to download any sort of component or anything in
order to run an application.
I was initially designing an ASP .NET 2.0 application, but it requires
the .NET download. I explained to my customer that this should not be
a major issue, since it is a Microsoft component that is quickly
becoming the de facto standard for a lot of custom written
applications. I tried explaining to them that the added benefits of
using .NET framework saves me time and them money, though I don't
think the cost is that serious of an issue with this customer (or at
least they don't truely understand that the cost difference would be
rediculous) - I would rather not have to go back to plain on ASP
coding and have to hand-write ^everything*!
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- References:
- can TS be used for restricted access to 1 application
- From: RoLaAus
- Re: can TS be used for restricted access to 1 application
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- Re: can TS be used for restricted access to 1 application
- From: RoLaAus
- can TS be used for restricted access to 1 application
- Prev by Date: Re: Restricting users to login on the server.
- Next by Date: Re: New to Terminal Services - Where to Begin
- Previous by thread: Re: can TS be used for restricted access to 1 application
- Next by thread: Re: can TS be used for restricted access to 1 application
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|