Re: Application caching



This is standard OS behaviour. I'm not sure what your expecting. Windows
has to make sure that the application is "locked" in case it needs to read
from it again. If the application is changed in the middle of user using it
the implications include crashing the user's application and potentially
session and potentially worse.

Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services


"Toni Van Remortel" <toni.van.remortel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:RGGdk.121644$jB5.81602@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi all,

We have set up Server 2008 with Terminal Server for about 10 users.
All those users use the same application (a single exe from a network
share).

The drawback is that when we update the application (in-house
development),
we need to ask all TS users to log out before they can use the new
version.
Somehow, the exe is cached by the TS server as long as someone has it
open,
and TS does not check if the exe on the network share is updated.

Is there a way to disable this behavior? When we update the application, a
simple close and reopen should open the new version, not the old cached
version.

Thanks a lot.
--
Regards,
Toni Van Remortel


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Who is using the EXE
    ... Running applications across a network is a bad idea for several reasons, ... The normal solution is to write a small launcher program which is installed ... if it finds a newer one on the server it copies it over the local ... I developed an application using VB6, placed the exe in a shared ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: Move MultiUser Access Database onto Terminal Services
    ... > Server or Citrix Metaframe, ... > though like any network it is possible to share an FE if the FE allows it (for ... >> Any help on whether terminal services would work would be much appreciated!! ... >> Systems Developer ...
    (microsoft.public.access.conversion)
  • Re: XP x 3+clipper=SLOW
    ... maybe a little when loading exe. ... I had the problem on "server" when i used mapped drive, ... it sounds like there is something wrong with how the network is ... Clipper applications and similar file sharing apps are run. ...
    (comp.lang.clipper)
  • Re: Move MultiUser Access Database onto Terminal Services
    ... "Chris Mills" wrote: ... > Server or Citrix Metaframe, ... > though like any network it is possible to share an FE if the FE allows it (for ... >> Any help on whether terminal services would work would be much appreciated!! ...
    (microsoft.public.access.conversion)
  • Re: Move MultiUser Access Database onto Terminal Services
    ... "Chris Mills" wrote: ... > Server or Citrix Metaframe, ... > though like any network it is possible to share an FE if the FE allows it (for ... >> Any help on whether terminal services would work would be much appreciated!! ...
    (microsoft.public.access.conversion)