Re: Is Remote Desktop vulnerable to brute force attacks?
- From: "Vera Noest [MVP]" <vera.noest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 14:44:37 -0800
Your normal account security settings for the domain should handle
this. Configure the maximum number of failed logon attempts before an
account is locked, as well as the duration of the lockout and whether
it needs to be unlocked manually by an Administrator or not.
I believe that there is a specific security event which in it's
description has a warning that your TS might be under attack, but the
only reports I have seen about this event is that it is mainly
triggered by some general network problems, and thus is a false
alarm.
_________________________________________________________
Vera Noest
MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
TS troubleshooting: http://ts.veranoest.net
___ please respond in newsgroup, NOT by private email ___
PSiegmann@xxxxxxx wrote on 04 jan 2008 in
microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:
Something I thought about some time now: Is RDP completely.
secure against brute force attacks?
I mean, does it stops someone, who throws 10000 password
combinations per minute? Can it sense such attacks?
- References:
- Is Remote Desktop vulnerable to brute force attacks?
- From: PSiegmann
- Is Remote Desktop vulnerable to brute force attacks?
- Prev by Date: Slow response opening local files
- Next by Date: Error in Licensing Protocol
- Previous by thread: Is Remote Desktop vulnerable to brute force attacks?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Remote Desktop vulnerable to brute force attacks?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|