RE: you are not licensed to run this application using windows termina

You should really contact the application vendor for this issue.
Some applications check if they are running in a TS session, and
then exit if they do. Either for licensing reasons, or because the
vendor knows that the application won't work in a TS environment.

If I assume that this application is only meant to be run by an
Administrator on the physical console of the server (meaning you
have a single user license), that could well explain the
application's error message and behaviour. The only (not :) funny
thing is that the application developer has made a mistake by not
allowing remote console sessions either.
_________________________________________________________
Vera Noest
MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
TS troubleshooting: http://ts.veranoest.net
___ please respond in newsgroup, NOT by private email ___

=?Utf-8?B?c2pz?= <sjs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 30 maj
2007 in microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:

Should also say I'm logging in as Administrator...

"sjs" wrote:

Is the error I get when I mstsc.exe /console to a server I've
installed Terminal Services and try to run an application.
Other apps don't bark at me. This particular app was installed
by my physical security company and I wonder if they chose an
option during the install process. The app uses SQL Lite.

tks,
steve
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Securityproblems
    ... Usability of an installed app by all Users is dependent on ... should not have to do this, so tell the vendor. ... > My drive is NTFS. ... The programs install in one directory ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.security_admin)
  • Re: Setup project: seamless install of msi, framework, MDAC
    ... Should we all allow any app from any vendor to "force install" what ever it wants to? ... That's why I say prep the network as agreed, and put a good patching plan in place, then your app will just install to whichever manifest they're running at that point in time. ... A classic mistake I've seen is where app vendor #1 installs SQL Server Express, doesn't take into account apps from other vendors on other instances then trashes those other apps. ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)
  • Re: Advantages of 2005
    ... it's a major headache and especially when a new framework is released. ... Does it still update the app if you don't have admin rights? ... What if the application vendor decides to install some SpyWare with "version 2.0" of their app? ... What if they decide you need other "components" to make their app work properly such as a new Microsoft Media Player that will report their activities back to WindowsMedia.com and the RIAA, or install a new component with a license agreement they don't agree to or an update that breaks previous functionality on their machine? ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)
  • Re: Terminal Server Role
    ... If after TS role was added, was the session in install ... doing some work on our phone server and terminal server role got added ... I believe the app was installed prior to the TS ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: Terminal Server Role
    ... If after TS role was added, was the session in install ... doing some work on our phone server and terminal server role got added ... I believe the app was installed prior to the TS ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)