Re: License server on same machine as Terminal Services: possible?
- From: Hank Arnold <rasilon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 04:35:14 -0400
Sure it's possible, at least with Server 2003. I believe that Server 2000 required it be on a DC.
There are advantages to having it on separate servers, but it's not *REQUIRED*.
I'm fascinated that you have an IT department, but you can set up your own servers...
Regards,
Hank Arnold
Wingnet wrote:
Hello,.
I've got some 2003 Terminal Services machines. The IT deparment is saying it's not possible to install Terminal Services Licensing Server on the same machine where Terminal Services exists i.e. keep the two on seperate machines. It's desirable to have them on the same machine at a site we have. I read in a MS help file that it is possible to install them both on the same machine.
Is this possible indeed? What are some things I should be concerned about or watch out for? The machines are not AD controllers, just regular servers.
Thanks!
Chris Smith
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: RE: net use
- Next by Date: Re: License server on same machine as Terminal Services: possible?
- Previous by thread: Re: License server on same machine as Terminal Services: possible?
- Next by thread: Re: License server on same machine as Terminal Services: possible?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading