Re: Terminal Server 32bit /PAE vs 64bit
- From: Jeff Pitsch <Jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:11:55 -0400
1) A 32-bit system cannot use more than 4gb of memory without PAE. PAE is ok but it will cut down on your kernel memory because it requires more PTE's to handle the extra addressing. Never EVER use the /3gb switch on a terminal server. Before any of this though, I would go ahead and do some real performance monitoring with something other than task manager. Your problem may not be memory but the fact that you have a 13gb page file. You really shouldn't have anymore than 4gb tops.
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Citrix Technology Professional
Provision Networks VIP
Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
http://jeffpitschconsulting.com
Jerry Alan Braga wrote:
We currently are running 2 win2003 EE sp2 terminal servers in an active directory domain that get their romaing profiles for the TS users from the DC. We are now running into performance issues (cpu/memory) as it seems from the task manager performance monitor that we cannot use more than 3.9gb of memory even though we have 9gb installed and have a 13gb page file (suggested by windows) and have the /pae switch enabled in the boot.ini without the /3gb switch..
My question is that does not the /pae along with win2003 EE give the ability of using up 16gb like it says for our applications. Our applications are 32bit based an I know about the 32bit limit of memory addressing but is that not what the /pae and win2003 EE supposed to address. Or does 64bit win2003 EE actually give you that through the WOW emulator to 32bit applications.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Terminal Server 32bit /PAE vs 64bit
- From: Jerry Alan Braga
- Re: Terminal Server 32bit /PAE vs 64bit
- References:
- Terminal Server 32bit /PAE vs 64bit
- From: Jerry Alan Braga
- Terminal Server 32bit /PAE vs 64bit
- Prev by Date: Re: Record Windows Console Sessions
- Next by Date: Re: Terminal Server Roaming Profiles and Outlook 2007
- Previous by thread: Terminal Server 32bit /PAE vs 64bit
- Next by thread: Re: Terminal Server 32bit /PAE vs 64bit
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading