Re: Remote Management
- From: "sajmo" <sajmo22@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 17:28:03 GMT
Hello,
Thank you for your response.
Is the communciation over 3389 secure?
Please can you recommend couple of firewalls which provide external
authentication.
Thanks
"Leythos" <Void@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1178843472_5957@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 10 May 2007 23:16:25 +0000, sajmo wrote:
Hello
I manage a remote windows SBS 2003 server; I have enabled TS in admin
mode. I remote on to the server using the default port TS port 3389 over
the internet. My question is this secure.
I design secure networks for state, military, and private companies - I
never directly expose 3389 to the internet.
If you want to allow RD into the Terminal Server, setup your firewall to
authenticate the user first, then allow authenticated users access to
3389. This means you can use non-AD user/passwords to auth the users, and
we don't allow their firewall user/password to match their AD user/
password.
--
Leythos
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
Calling an illegal alien an "undocumented worker" is like calling
a drug dealer an "unlicensed pharmacist"
spam999free@xxxxxxxxxx (remove 999 for proper email address)
.
- References:
- Remote Management
- From: sajmo
- Re: Remote Management
- From: Leythos
- Remote Management
- Prev by Date: Re: WIndows 2003 Remote Desktop Does client have to have Admin rights?
- Next by Date: Re: WIndows 2003 Remote Desktop Does client have to have Admin rights?
- Previous by thread: Re: Remote Management
- Next by thread: Re: Terminal Svs. Roaming Profile
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|