RE: Terminal server with 50 users simultanious
- From: "Vera Noest [MVP]" <vera.noest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 12:55:52 -0700
=?Utf-8?B?TWF0dFNoZWxs?= <MattShell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote on 30 mar 2007 in
microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:
I would
say my users average 100 MB of RAM per users, but you should
probably bet on 200MB to be safe. 200 MB x 50 users = 10 GB of
RAM.
I don't think it's this easy....
The use of dynamic memory allocation and shared memory means that you
can't just multiply the memory usage of one user times the number of
users.
Have a look at Patrick's Scaling page:
http://www.sessioncomputing.com/scaling.htm
_________________________________________________________
Vera Noest
MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
TS troubleshooting: http://ts.veranoest.net
___ please respond in newsgroup, NOT by private email ___
.
- References:
- Terminal server with 50 users simultanious
- From: Øystein Sund
- Terminal server with 50 users simultanious
- Prev by Date: Re: Printer redirection not anymore working - driver problem
- Next by Date: Re: installation of word on TS
- Previous by thread: Terminal server with 50 users simultanious
- Next by thread: RE: Researching TS for new setup
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
