Re: Slowly Terminal Server response
- From: "Stefan Vermeulen" <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:44:34 +0100
You can use (free) threadmater to cap the cpu usage on your access app:
http://threadmaster.tripod.com/
How much memory is left when the 20 sessions are running?
Regards,
--
Stefan Vermeulen
MVP - Terminal Server
http://www.printingsupport.com
"Thomas Kroljic" <tkroljic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:OI6QQA%23MHHA.4712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All,
We have a Terminal Services server (w2k, 2gb RAM) running in application
mode. Recently, the server (the users response) has been running extremely
slow. We have about 20 users connecting to this server via a VPN
connection to our main server (SBS 2k3 R2) and then they connect to our
Terminal Server with the TS client software or Remote Desktop Connection
(should they all be
using the TS Client software and could this be the problem).
The application that the users are using is an MS Access applications.
Pretty simple: data entry forms, query listings, reports. Very low
transactional
application.
I went into the Task Manager and noticed that the spoolsv.exe is taking
up a large amount of memory. I quess my question is what should I be
looking for to
find out why the server is running so slowly?
Is there a good article on TS regarding system requirements for x amount
of users connecting?
Any help or guidance would be appreciated.
Follow-up info:
the CPU will peg at 100% sometimes for 10 - 20 seconds at a clip. The
culprits seem to be the Access applications (sessions).
This particular Terminal Server has 2 CPU chips (Dell P1400, SP4). Not
sure why the application would grab 100% of the CPU.
This is becoming a major problem for some of our users. Not sure where I
should be looking.
Is there a parameter that I can tweak to tell the CPU to only allocate a
certain amount of CPU time (cycle) per user at any given time?
Memory wise, each Access session seems to be taken up about 22,000k to
32,000k of Mem Usage.
Again, if there is a good white-paper on this issues or subject I'd be
glad to read it.
Sorry for double posting this issue. The last time I sent this in was over
a month
ago and I, yes I, never followed up on the response.
Thank you,
Thomas Kroljic
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slowly Terminal Server response
- From: Thomas Kroljic
- Re: Slowly Terminal Server response
- References:
- Slowly Terminal Server response
- From: Thomas Kroljic
- Slowly Terminal Server response
- Prev by Date: Re: Pre caching profiles
- Next by Date: Re: Remote reboot of TS box
- Previous by thread: Slowly Terminal Server response
- Next by thread: Re: Slowly Terminal Server response
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|