Re: Deciding weather to go for terminal server?



As a rule of thumb, I dont like the "buy a terminal server to avoid
upgrading PC" approach.

Yes, you can save some money, but you still have your old PC.

You'll get the perfomance gain only for applications running on the server,
and there are applications you are not going to run there, like:
- applications which "move away" with your notebook
- applications with specific hardware requirement (hardware key, high end
graphic cards)
- application to interface hardware (palmtops, cameras, scanners)
- that new application you are testing / evaluating

I also dont think you would use a terminal client to browse the internet or
check you email.

Last but not least, why did you need to upgrade to XP Pro?
Despite I would suggest you to do it and migrate to a small domain, it seems
not a requirement.
If it already works with Home Edition, just add some RAM and /or replace the
oldest PCs.

Kind regards,
Corrado


"Mike" <darshakusa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164732899.226597.172770@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello everyone:
we are a small company with 15 users/ desktops - one p3 and rest p4 2.2

- all with 256 mb ram and 40/80 gb hdd - single location - on a
workgroup with one xp pro and rest xp home machines. v were ok till we
upgrade our accounting software to peachtree quantum 2007 which is our
main application which has runtime sql server database. new peachtree
slows down our system to a good extent but still works :)
we have been adviced to go for new server with 4 gb ram and raid 5 with

3 hard disk - install windows 2003 and terminal server - so that v just

have to buy terminal server licenses for users and not to invest in
upgrading from xp home to pro and 256 mb ram to 512 or a gig on all pc.

our main concern is we need to know the experience of someone with
similar setup and also how much difference it will make in speed and
maintenance? are there any technical issues?
we thank you in advance for your feedback.
Mike.



.



Relevant Pages

  • RE: Terminal Services stops responding on our Windows Server 2003
    ... Your terminal server issue appears to have several potential causes. ... first thing to check are the applications running. ... initiate a best practices for deployment of terminal services. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: RPC Server Is Unavailable on 2003 TS but not on 2000 TS
    ... Windows Server 2003 and you receive an "The RPC service is ... MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server ... There are 2 major SQL applications running all the time ... They have tested logging the entire office in to the 2003 TS ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: RPC Server Is Unavailable on 2003 TS but not on 2000 TS
    ... number of things based on previous posts on Technet as well as posts found ... Windows Server 2003 and you receive an "The RPC service is ... MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server ... There are 2 major SQL applications running all the time ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: RPC Server Is Unavailable on 2003 TS but not on 2000 TS
    ... Check the troubleshooting tips on EventID.net, ... MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server ... applications loaded and they only put in the new 2003 TS ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • RE: Windows 2003 Server Terminal Services
    ... I tried the first .bat idea, and though it worked, it left the batch file ... accessing applications which they should run. ... MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server ... Terminal Server role and the Terminal Services Licensing ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)