Re: terminal server on VMware

And I would agree but again, it depends on your constraints. It is also
good to have an idea of what 64-bit does and does not deliver. I know for a
fact that many people have been unable to use the PS4 UPD in their
environment because it has been very buggy for them. As well if your CPU
constrained or disk constrained, 64-bit will not buy you much at all unless
you can alleviate those somehow. It's hard sticking more processors in a
dual proc box if both slots are already filled. :)

Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server

Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
http://jeffpitschconsulting.com

My whole point was that a solution that works for one does not necessarily
means it will work for everyone. Any solution needs to be tested and
verified first before full implementation. I've worked with a couple of
customers that have moved to 64-bit without realizing the consequences of
doing so.
"Peter Lawton" <devnull@fakedomain> wrote in message
news:%232dhaw1oGHA.4268@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
We've just moved from 32bit Citrix PS4 servers to 64bit and have found we
can get more than twice the number of users comfortably, with better
performance, on the new x64 servers than the old x32 servers. The server
hardware is the same (HP DL585) but with more RAM.

Fortunately with Citrix PS4 printer drivers aren't an issue when the
network printers are connected from the client PC, the terminal server
just uses the generic Citrix x64 driver combined with the 32bit driver on
the client.

We were also lucky that only one of our legacy apps won't run under x64,
so we run that as a seamless published app to the x64 servers from a very
small 32bit Citrix server.

Altogether I've been very impressed by how much better x64 terminal
servers are than 32bit, at least in our environment, faster, more users
and more stable, but YMMV.

Peter lawton

"Jeff Pitsch" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uVeAgwkoGHA.4152@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Keep in mind there are limitations to 64-bit. Mainly driver support
(including printer drivers). Memory requirements for 32-bit apps as well
(1.3 - 1.7 x the normal amount of memory) and others. 64-bit is fine but
you must take everything into consideration and figure out if it is
really what you need. If you aren't kernel constrained then 64-bit may
not be what you need. How many users? what applications? what are your
bottlenecks? etc. I would definately not blindly move to 64-bit until
you have business reasons to do so.

And who listens to Ron anyway? lol, j/k Ron :)

Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server

Forums not enough?
Get support from the experts at your business
http://jeffpitschconsulting.com

"VirtualTMAC" <timothymcfadden@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152313181.452127.37590@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have been going through this dilemma myself.. I talked to some
experts from rapid app (they are the number one Citrix and Vmware
consulting firm) and they told me that vmware is not the way to go
right now. When the hypervisor support is built in to vmware then it
will be a great option. You best option right now would be to buy a
couple of Dual Core, AMD DL385 or DL585 boxes with 16gb of RAM Windows
2003 server 64-bit. There is a huge performance improvement with
64-bit and I was to my surprise able to get all 60 of our 32-bit apps
running on 64-bit without a problem. You will want to get a couple of
server and load balance them so that if you want to take one out of
service for maintenance you can. That is why I chose the 385s.


Here is another resource that gets into detail on this.

Interview with Ron Oglesby on Citrix, VMware, and mixing them together

http://www.brianmadden.com/content/content.asp?ID=579

TMAC


marinus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,
what to do.


Several (proliant) servers in a TS farm. Session directory on one of
them

or

HP ml570 (?) = very big machine with 4 CPU's and 10 GB memm and then
install several VM server to create the TS-farm.


What is the best option to create a stable and fast Terminal Server
envirement that is easy to controll.


regards

Marinus







.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Trouble Launching Apps
    ... Oh yes - this apps have been used for years, even currently, and even ... this new server that I have misconfigured. ... If I log onto the server (via Citrix client, MSRDP, or at the console ... So the administrator group itslef doesn't seem to have access ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: Is there a way to detect published appplications?
    ... You point at one server and that server talks to the session broker who then ... It's similar to what Citrix does with ZDC's ... "Jeff Pitsch" wrote: ... Can you publish the apps to the farm? ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: terminal server on VMware
    ... The print driver issues are ... Thinprint, Citrix,.. ... *most* apps worked without any issues.. ... Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: TS 2003 Newbie
    ... I use Citrix (which TS needs to be installed on the server Citrix goes on), and Citrix is what manages and hosts my applications. ... For example, I believe when using MS Office, if you have 10 users logging into this server to use those apps, you'd need to purchase 10 licenses of Office to be properly licensed, but I could be wrong about that, but I don't think so. ... However I cant seem to find much on installing applications on TS once ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: Access to Access DB
    ... Given so many constraints and the only thing they have in common is ... side scripted language and rent server space. ... Finding a hosted service for Office is not a ... cost or work and skilling up. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted)