Re: Security TS
Most $50 NAT routers today do include an SPI firewall, and as Patrick
pointed out, that is better than leaving it wide open for port 137-139, etc,
to be hacked.
Gregg Hill
"Frankster" <Frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BLWdnYHmbvTyTMHZRVn-rA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Even putting it behind a $50 NAT router
A NAT router is not a firewall. Hence, my statements. I see no conflict
between your response and mine.
-Frank
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: d-link DI-604
... port scanner telling that there *is* a port there. ... That way, the port will NOT answer to any hackers, but ... Similar for other fixed port protocols triggering reverse auth -- ... Setting up rules like the above can be done on most NAT routers. ...
(comp.security.firewalls) - Re: d-link DI-604
... >> packets), the black hats won't see the difference between that IP ... > router or FW that's protecting the port so what? ... let you connect at all without an ident reply. ... >> Setting up rules like the above can be done on most NAT routers. ...
(comp.security.firewalls) - Re: DNS problems
... > UDP source port set to 53, ... Most NAT routers ... > only allow port forwarding of the desintation TCP port. ... i host my DNS and use a cisco NAT router and it works ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.general) - Port Translation based on Source Address
... I've heard that some firewalls / nat routers are capable of carrying ... I want to configure a nat/pat to forward port 22 from the public ...
(comp.security.firewalls) - Re: DNS problems
... > UDP source port set to 53, ... Most NAT routers ... > only allow port forwarding of the desintation TCP port. ... i host my DNS and use a cisco NAT router and it works ...
(microsoft.public.windows.server.general) |
|
