Re: Terminal server lockdown
- From: "Jules Lister" <listerj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:58:40 GMT
Why don't you create a AD group, or use the groups you already have defined
for you various users and put these in the Scope of the GPO and remove the
Authenticated Users?
Then any group not listed in the scope will not get the GPO applied.
Jules
"Mark Bowles" <MarkBowles@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:05932A17-9C6D-404A-ADF1-4FC49AC3EA3F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have the same issue. Where do you deny permissions for administrator?Deny
Mark
"DJ" wrote:
Gee wiz, that is so obvious. I have it so drilled in my head to avoid
sessions. Ipermissions that I didn't even consider it. Thanks.
"Richard Gadsden" wrote:
DJ wrote:
I'm putting together a GPO for locking down terminal server user
terminalcreated a loopback policy that enforces the user settings in the
thatserver's policy. However, the settings also apply to administrators
tologin to the server. How do I prevent these settings from applying
administrators?
Set the permission on the policy to deny it to administrators.
--
Richard Gadsden
"I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death
your right to say it" - Attributed to Voltaire
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Terminal server lockdown
- From: Vera Noest [MVP]
- Re: Terminal server lockdown
- Prev by Date: RE: Spooler Service Problems
- Next by Date: Re: Yet Another Slow Connection/Logon Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Terminal server lockdown
- Next by thread: Re: Terminal server lockdown
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|