Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- From: "Jeff Pitsch" <jeff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 09:00:30 -0500
for additional info:
http://www.brianmadden.com/content/content.asp?ID=76
There are also good performance stuff in the book I mentioned as well.
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
http://www.sbcgatekeeper.com
Your Terminal Services Security Website
"Sonya" <Sonya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:A89CA67E-F926-4ECC-AFBF-F072C0BDAA3C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do you adding another 1 or 2 GB of ram will resolve the performance issue?
Or do you suggest in adding more ram and another Processor?
"Jeff Pitsch" wrote:
What you have is probably a hyperthreading showing as two processors.
Try
adding a second processor, this should help. It may also be that your
application is very resource intensive and your servers were never
properly
sized. You may also try adding more memory because high CPU and high
pagefile could indicate you have run out of memory and it is paging
excessively to make up for the fact.
Jeff Pitsch
Microsoft MVP - Terminal Services
http://www.sbcgatekeeper.com
Your Terminal Services Security Website
"Sonya" <Sonya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:E0FE86FF-EDF7-4B4C-AED6-571F3AD23549@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm reviewing the server specs again and we have 2 processors and I'm
not
sure if is load balancing to help with the performance.
FYI, here are the specs just to provide a better look of the server:
OS Name Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Server 2003, Standard Edition
Version 5.2.3790 Service Pack 1 Build 3790
Other OS Description Not Available
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System Name MFDAPP
System Manufacturer HP
System Model ProLiant DL380 G4
System Type X86-based PC
Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 1 GenuineIntel ~3200 Mhz
Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 1 GenuineIntel ~3200 Mhz
BIOS Version/Date HP P51, 4/27/2005
SMBIOS Version 2.3
Windows Directory C:\WINDOWS
System Directory C:\WINDOWS\system32
Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume1
Locale United States
Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "5.2.3790.1830
(srv03_sp1_rtm.050324-1447)"
User Name Not Available
Time Zone Eastern Standard Time
Total Physical Memory 2,047.47 MB
Available Physical Memory 1.46 GB
Total Virtual Memory 1.19 GB
Available Virtual Memory 573.84 MB
Page File Space 3.33 GB
Page File C:\pagefile.sys
"Vera Noest [MVP]" wrote:
How many CPUs does the server have? Seems that the CPU is the
bottleneck.
Have you checked in Task Manager on the server if there is a single
application which uses most of the CPU? 16-bit application are known
to monopolise the CPU.
Before you buy additional hardware, run Performance Monitor on the
server to ensure that the CPU is really the bottleneck. Could be
something else as well, like memory, page file, disk I/O.
_________________________________________________________
Vera Noest
MCSE, CCEA, Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
TS troubleshooting: http://ts.veranoest.net
SQL troubleshooting: http://sql.veranoest.net
___ please respond in newsgroup, NOT by private email ___
=?Utf-8?B?U29ueWE=?= <Sonya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 04
mar 2006 in microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services:
I am running Windows 2003 Terminal Server and it is our
Application server as well. I have 28 nodes running all
application from the Server through RDP sessions. This is a thin
client environment. Is there anyway to improve performance?
Throughout the week there is performance downgrade, CPU is
running between 80 - 100% and I have to sometimes reboot the
server to increase performance.
Any suggestions to detect the bottlenecks and how to improve
performance?
Thanks
.
- References:
- Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- From: Vera Noest [MVP]
- Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- From: Sonya
- Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- From: Jeff Pitsch
- Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- From: Sonya
- Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- Next by Date: Re: TSWeb AuthenticationLevel
- Previous by thread: Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- Next by thread: Re: Terminal Sessions performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|